Donna Brazile Admits Leaking Questions To Hillary Clinton | Soshal Network, Social Circle Connection

Donna Brazile Admits Leaking Questions To Hillary Clinton


Enjoyed the video ladies check these swimsuits out

During the political election, TYT damaged the tale of Donna Brazile leaking questions to the Clinton project. Cenk Uygur, the host of The Young Turks, reveal you how she simply admitted it. Tell us exactly what you think in the remark section listed below.

" For weeks now, we have actually seen a consistent stream– not just leakages– of information concerning feasible get in touches with in between the Trump campaign and the Russians. This seeks the F.B.I. as well as our knowledge community determined that Russia interfered in the United States election with the aim of electing Donald Trump president.

For our country, and also our democracy, this level of interference requires a complete as well as independent investigation. And that investigation needs to begin currently.

These destructive strikes were not a short-lived cyber breach. The attacks were coordinated by a foreign opponent as well as performed for over a year with devastating outcomes for those people who were targeted, and also ultimately for every American.

The recent wave of revelations shows communications between Trump officials and also Russian operatives, conversations in between Kremlin officials regarding their contacts with Trump affiliates, and information from our allies regarding meetings between the Trump group as well as Russian operatives in Europe."

Read more right here:

Hosts: Cenk Uygur

Cast: Cenk Uygur


The Largest Online Information Show in the World. Organized by Cenk Uygur as well as Ana Kasparian. LIVE STREAMING weekdays 6-8pm ET.

Young Turk (n), 1. Youthful modern or insurgent participant of an institution, motion, or political party. 2. Young person that rebels against authority or social expectations. (American Heritage Dictionary).

Download audio and video of the complete both hr program on-demand + the members-only message game show by coming to be a member at. Your membership supports the everyday procedures as well as is crucial for our continued success as well as development.

Get The Young Turks Mobile App Today!

Download and install the iOS version below:.

Download the Android version here:.

Share Your Comments


  1. Posted by J smo, at Reply

    Wow, during an election where the other team was colluding with a hostile foreign power, way to dig deep and uncover the critical issues.

  2. Posted by Yugioh12, at Reply


    • Posted by Trollop 7, at Reply

      +Victor Von Doom, +J CA
      And what have you been up to lately?

    • Posted by Victor Von Doom, at Reply

      +Trollop 7 I am the leader of Latveria and currently Iron Man. You?

    • Posted by Burning Sandals, at Reply


    • Posted by Brando's Bando, at Reply

      Yugioh12 you hear about that trump supporter kidnapping that girl

  3. Posted by Jacob Hansen, at Reply

    In my native country Ukraine, where i lived for many years, peons like her would be publicly punished.

    • Posted by Mohammed The Pedophile, at Reply

      Repvoid any different from your trigglypuff campuses where fatties throw tantrum until they’re out of breath ?

    • Posted by Kareem, at Reply

      +Mohammed The Pedophile what sup. Muhammad promise me so much pizza in the next life. Can’t wait!

  4. Posted by Wayne Morgan, at Reply

    Dayuum we Wikileaks now? TYT broke the story? TYT confirmed Russian hackers.

    • Posted by Mike Connors, at Reply

      Well..they were correct and they practiced journalism? No idea why you are using the quotation marks. Jordan was one of the few journalists that actually covered the wikileaks on a near daily basis and was the one that broke the story about Donna Brazille. Jordan also confronted her on camera you can see news networks like Fox are using his interview to show the story. Seems like fine journalism in this case at the very least.

    • Posted by Barry Nichols, at Reply

      Wayne Morgan TYT didn’t confirm Russian hacking. In fact they have taken a balanced view. They don’t let the Dems off the hook at all.
      Your post makes you sound stupid.

    • Posted by Kenshin0011, at Reply

      Steins Gate will save us from this world filled with Trump and corporate dems!

    • Posted by goldilox369, at Reply

      Wayne Morgan- We are the watchers on the Wall!

  5. Posted by Oscar Martinez, at Reply

    Hillary and the DNC give us the gift that keeps on given = Donald Trump.

    • Posted by Incerthose A. IntoBee, at Reply

      1)Kicking out 11 million illegal immigrants
      2)Building a wall to keep them out
      3)Keeping Hillary Clinton out of office
      4)Protecting our Constitutional freedoms which Clinton would have done everything in her power to kill (specifically the 2nd Amendment)
      5)Putting common sense above political correctness.
      I could go on

    • Posted by Incerthose A. IntoBee, at Reply

      Not paid a dime. It’s my pleasure pointing out your ignorance, imbecility, hypocrisy, and stupidity. I do that for free.

  6. Posted by Tom W, at Reply

    and she still lost

    • Posted by Galactic Scholar, at Reply

      She lost every one of those debates easily. Trump out-lied her every time.

    • Posted by Zil Osorno, at Reply

      Hillary Clinton paid shill #4269 IT WAS STOLEN BY RUSSIA? HAHAHA.

    • Posted by aaronpolitical, at Reply

      That was against Bernie, not Trump.

    • Posted by adrenacrumb, at Reply

      How did telling her someone in a town with poisoned water making people sick would ask about the water not put her over the top?

    • Posted by adrenacrumb, at Reply

      I can only imagine how excited the Clinton campaign was when the found out the town with the water epidemic would ask about it. Goddamn, thanks Donna, we just might pull this thing out now. What’s next, a town on fire might ask about the fire?

  7. Posted by Milo Purr, at Reply

    And he still won! 😈😈

    • Posted by JoshCube2, at Reply

      Kitty!! **Pats your head**

    • Posted by Trollop 7, at Reply

      But how? By what sorcery?

  8. Posted by Savage-American Imperialist, at Reply

    We already knew this. Young Cucks are late, super late! Idiots.

    • Posted by TheTruthNJ09, at Reply

      How can they be late to a story THEY BROKE?!


    • Posted by Mandy Schmidt, at Reply

      A trump voter’s insult to those they disagree with is generally a confession. Hence why they use the term “cuck” so much

    • Posted by Incerthose A. IntoBee, at Reply

      Was that an attempt at humor? It didn’t work.

    • Posted by TCt83067695, at Reply

      Savage-American Imperialist we have *ample* evidence… we have *ample* evidence…we have *ample* evidence…

  9. Posted by Sonoma Calling!, at Reply

    What does the alleged Russian hacking have anything to do with her leaking question? Why even mention it at all? Brazile didn’t mention the hacking to provide context. She was obviously trying to deflect.

    • Posted by Trollop 7, at Reply

      Gotta keep the muh-Russians pot boiling, as per HRC’s master plan.

  10. Posted by fux yews, at Reply

    Hillary got the questions in advance, and despite a whole team of writers and a significant amount of time to construct an answer, she still failed to provide any kind of answer that was precise, coherent, meaningful and wasn’t even capable of presenting her non-answers as anything but a mechanoid built to evade communication..

    How bad of a candidate do you have to be to achieve that level of incompetence and inauthenticity?
    The woman was a truly awful candidate by every stretch of the imagination, no wonder people voted for the orange windbag… anyone would appear more presentable by comparison..

    The DNC and the Hillary voters made a historically bad choice and effectively left the goal wide open for flag-waving seals to score a goal against themselves and everyone else.. again..
    I guess voting for a woman because she’s a woman and spending a solid decade calling half the nation a group of racists and bigots didn’t convince voters that progressive values were a positive thing…who would have thought..

    I guess we can chalk this up to yet another time when so called ‘liberals’ of this era ultimately REGRESSED us by being toxic, inflexible and reactionary… perhaps its time for these people to go and join another team in another nation because they’re really not welcome anymore… we’ll never have true progressive policies with these people constantly pulling us backwards more than the conservatives..

    For shame, Hillary voters. I sure hope you people get your game together for the next election… but I doubt it.. THAT requires putting the blame on those responsible (dnc, you and Hillary herself), and we sure as hell know thats not going to happen.. personal responsibility and introspection are apparently no longer traits of Liberalism..

    • Posted by Snakeye808, at Reply

      It’s worth noting that she got one possible question in advance, and it was during the primary debates. Trump has unsurprisingly fooled his gullible supporters into believing she had every question in advance of the general election debates.

    • Posted by Richard Atkinson, at Reply

      Trump’s supporters are certainly extremely gullible. However, so are you if you think it was just one question. Brazile said “from time to time I get the questions in advance.” We know from the completely undeniable evidence that she gave the Clinton campaign at least one question. So, we know Brazile is a cheater, that the entire Clinton campaign had a culture of cheating in various other ways during the primary, and that Brazile had access to multiple questions in advance “from time to time.” I think only a completely naive person could believe it was only one question, based on those facts.

    • Posted by Snakeye808, at Reply

      Richard Atkinson, you can argue that but it’s purely speculation. We only have evidence of one question based on the emails. So according to the facts, you are wrong.

    • Posted by Richard Atkinson, at Reply

      No – there is incomplete evidence for both the claim that there was only one question and the claim that there were multiple. The evidence that we do have makes the second possibility far more likely, which means that neither of us can prove we are right or wrong, but I’m far more likely to be right. Your same logic was used to try to justify her pay-to-play schemes with Saudi Arabia, etc. “There’s no proof of a quid pro quo,” people like you said. The lack of incontrovertible evidence does not mean something that is extremely likely to have happened didn’t happen. So, according to the facts, no, I’m not wrong.

  11. Posted by Cisco Blue, at Reply

    Hey Liberals happy you made us have Hillary as our candidate?

    • Posted by Tiffany N, at Reply


    • Posted by blupheonix44, at Reply

      NickTheGreatAndPowerful rofl!

    • Posted by Just_Bri, at Reply

      Cisco Blue hey Bernie or Bust crowd are you happy you mad us have Trump as our President?

    • Posted by Tiffany N, at Reply

      Actually many Bernie supporters ended up voting for Hillary and a few did go Green. Independents are the ones who actually tipped the scales in favor of Trump. Hillary didn’t offer anything to Independents whereas Trump made an effort to fool them. FYI Just_Bri Hillary did not set foot in WI during the critical general election period. She rightfully lost the state.

  12. Posted by Andy Gomez, at Reply

    Hillary for prison 2017

  13. Posted by Saleem Says, at Reply

    Excuse me, but I’ll start getting mad at Russian interference when I see actual evidence for it

    • Posted by Snakeye808, at Reply

      LOL these russian trolls come to every TYT video to act like Putin is so innocent and pretend that it’s not a well-established fact they interfered with the election. They sure are dedicated to pushing their propaganda.

    • Posted by Snakeye808, at Reply

      Alpha Thelema, it’s been widely known for a long time that Putin employs thousands of paid Russian trolls to spread disinformation on the web. It’s amusing and somewhat disturbing to see them on all over TYT’s channel.

      Russian is quite outspoken about how much they despise Hillary Clinton, and Putin felt she meddled in his election and called it into question when she made remarks like how the Russian people “deserve to have their voices heard and their votes counted, and that means they deserve fair, free transparent elections and leaders who are accountable to them.” Putin vowed to have revenge, yet he also wanted to demonstrate his power and showcase his ability to influence our election and undermine our democracy. If you ask me, they’re doing a fine job.

      Thus the question is not whether Russia interfered with the election. We already know that part is true. The question now is the extent of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russian government, and here’s what we know so far:

    • Posted by Cooper 360, at Reply

      Yeah lol I’m not a Russian, a Trump supporter, or a paid shill for anybody. I’m a liberal college student who supported Sanders lol. It remains entirely possible that Russia is behind the hacks, and entirely likely that they *wanted* to influence the US election, what I’m saying is that I have not been shown anywhere any actual evidence that they did. This “but Tillerson and Flynn met with/talked to” stuff is meaningless unless you can reliably attest to the *content* of these meetings, and besides the point, their meetings are irrelevant to whether or not hard evidence exists for Russian intelligence being behind the hacks.

      It has been agreed upon by everybody that the vote was not hacked by Russia, and that the popular vote was legitimate. There is no evidence to the contrary.

      You continue to talk about “mountains” of evidence for Russian intelligence being directly behind the DNC hacks, but you still have yet to provide any of that evidence. You do realize that just saying “there’s lots of evidence” doesn’t actually constitute evidence right?

    • Posted by Snakeye808, at Reply

      Cooper 360, It doesn’t really matter much to me whether or not you accept the facts and evidence. You can keep saying the earth is flat if you please. Nevertheless, if you think Trump’s campaign lying about meetings with Russian ambassadors and also lying about what was discussed is “meaningless” then I don’t know what you would consider meaningful. They wanted to keep these discussions secretive for a reason, and the only reason we even know about them is due to leakers in the white house. We can only imagine what else the investigation has uncovered up to this point, but I find it quite worrisome that Trump aggressively attacks our allies and leaders around the world, yet never says a bad word about Putin and consistently repeats talking points from Russian media.

      Lastly, ‘m perplexed as to why you act like there’s no evidence of Russia being behind the hacks after the hacking was traced directly back to Russian hackers. The question is: what more evidence could you possibly want?! Every intelligence agency and both parties are in complete agreement on this issue. There’s simply no debate.

  14. Posted by eval1979 v, at Reply

    Why is Cenk saying The Russians interfered in our elections? Is that a fact? I’m not kidding, I’m honestly asking for real.

    • Posted by ? ?, at Reply

      Do we go after NBC for leaking the tape of Trump. Wouldn’t that fall into the same interference by pushing away voters in the last days? NBC being a major media outlet who obviously showed bias

    • Posted by Skoal Machiavelli, at Reply

      ODNI document is a toad stool of a report. Cherry picked statistics and no actual proof of anything but finger pointing at Russia because why not.
      FFS, Crowd Strike was the third party company that was paid by the DNC to give the FBI their report. FBI, CIA,NSA, and DHS have never seen the seen the server with the “evidence ” but took the word of a mediocre tech company who blatantly fabricated their report because surprise surprise the Democrats wanted to cover up their corruption.

    • Posted by userasdf, at Reply

      Skoal Machiavelli+ References for that would be appreciated if you can provide them.

    • Posted by userasdf, at Reply

      ?? NBC is an American news organization… their responsibility is to inform us about the presidential candidates.. That’s one of the tenets of a democracy… If there was a tape they had of Clinton that they refused to release, then you can definitely claim bias. But it’s still legal and not as big a deal as a foreign entities doing so.

  15. Posted by AntiFOX, at Reply

    Wow, what an honest woman she is! Covering her confession under a big pile of lies, russophobia and scapegoating BULLSHIT!
    Away with that hillbot & crook!

    • Posted by Atmost11, at Reply

      Donna Brazille threw chairs at me, the chairs were raining down.  I was scared for my life.

    • Posted by Atmost11, at Reply

      Yes we got to go to war, for the Crimean people.  Or it’ll be Red Dawn.  Vote for Democrats.

  16. Posted by Jason H, at Reply

    Take money out of politics and all election problems go away.

    • Posted by Literally Pepe, at Reply

      Yeah then it means only rich people can become politicians, great logic

    • Posted by Jason H, at Reply

      No it means that we will have free elections that aren’t owned by rich people. As it is now only rich people are politicians assclown.

  17. Posted by Hobbes Tiger, at Reply

    I bet the Norwegians would pick a great candidate.

  18. Posted by IFREEDOMI, at Reply

    But we let Israel pick all our candidates