Google​ Proves The Pay Gap Is REAL And It’s F****d Up! | Soshal Network, Social Circle Connection

Google​ Proves The Pay Gap Is REAL And It’s F****d Up!


Enjoyed the video ladies check these swimsuits out

Hannah Cranston earnings war on Google for perpetuating pay difference and gushing some significant bs at the same time. See extra TYT Facebook Originals at

Adhere to Hannah on Twitter:
Comply with Hannah on Instagram:

Share Your Comments


  1. Posted by Biggus Dickus, at Reply

    *3 points that show the wage gap is BS:*
    1. men spend an average 14% more time at work (he’s 9x more likely to die there)
    2. men choose higher pay specializations (engineering, science, finance, pharma) vs women (psychology, theology, social work)
    3. young (ages 22-30) childless women out earn men by 8%

    • Posted by Bluedragon094, at Reply

      +Anton Karlsson
      _”Trump never made that argument, just like liberals never made the argument that variables such as specialization shouldn’t be accounted for.”_

      That’s not quite true. Every time a liberal/feminist/whatever cites the “women earn about 79 cents for every man’s dollar!” statistic they’re arguing that such variables shouldn’t be accounted for.

    • Posted by alvatrous, at Reply

      That article was worthless

    • Posted by Anton Karlsson, at Reply

      The point is that feminists and liberals don’t make that argument, can you read coherently?

      Yes, some world leaders and very radical feminists may throw around false statistics, some of them because they’re stupid and some of them to confuse us, but so do radical right wingers too. I think that a few radicals and stupid people shouldn’t represent all liberals, just like a few nut jobs on the right shouldn’t represent all right wingers.

    • Posted by Leek, at Reply

      These are men’s rights activists IIRC.

    • Posted by Bluedragon094, at Reply

      +Anton Karlsson
      Stow the attitude.

      My point is that feminists and liberals do make that argument because it’s a fairly popular feminist talking point, and just because you don’t like the implications of that doesn’t give you the right to merely attribute it all to the fringe of that group.

      Don’t get me wrong, that’s not free license to not take people on a case by case basis. It doesn’t mean a few bad apples spoil the bunch either. It doesn’t even mean that you and your liberal/feminist friends all necessarily make that argument. All it means is that it’s a popular feminist bad argument. That’s it. That’s really it.

  2. Posted by Mat Broomfield, at Reply

    Well you could hardly be more patronising if you tried. Way to win people on board with your argument. Now let’s just check your citations… Well waddya know – none. Not massively surprised.

    • Posted by Mat Broomfield, at Reply

      Criticising my vocabulary? That’s about the lowest form of comment. I wasn’t aware that this was an English test. I mean if we’re being pedantic where’s that apostrophe bro’? Idiot.

    • Posted by Onodera1980, at Reply

      +Mat Broomfield it wasn’t your grammar, but ignorance of scientific jargon I pointed out.

  3. Posted by Preem, at Reply

    More Marxist propaganda, what else do you expect from this channel

    • Posted by nrgarcia1071, at Reply

      +MaoTseFunkadelic this is basic Marxism, companies and men are the oppressors, women are the oppressed working class

    • Posted by MaoTseFunkadelic, at Reply

      +nrgarcia1071 No it isn’t (although it may the position of some people who call themselves Marxists). Marxism is about the inner logic of capitalism, about generalized commodity production for exchange, value-relations and the capital-labour relation. (following the tradition of classical political economy from Petty->Smith->Ricardo).

    • Posted by nrgarcia1071, at Reply

      +MaoTseFunkadelic but on of the major ideas in Marxism is the conflict between the proletariat and the bourgeois. The ruling and working class. Which is the idea we see pushed here and pushed all over the place

    • Posted by MaoTseFunkadelic, at Reply

      No, the ‘major’ idea of Marxism is a modification of Petty/Smith/Ricardo’s Labour Theory of Value, specifically that value is socially necessary abstract labour time (rather than concrete labour time), and that one special commodity, labour, produces more value than its own (i.e labour can produce more value than the value necessary to keep them alive). That is the origin of profit in a capitalist (rather than merely mercantile/commercial sense), and it is competitively compelled rather than arbitrarily imposed. Marxism is not about crude typologies and abstractions from semi-empirical groups, but about underlying relationships.

      That is not the message we see here, again and again. The message we see here is that social divisions are an expression of arbitrary ‘discrimination’ and amorphous ‘power’ reproduced by ‘culture’. It is a circular and mystifying argument that has nothing to do with (and actually arose largely out of the post-structuralist reaction to) Marxism.

    • Posted by Ragnarok Sora, at Reply

      Industrial Capitalism might of work very well during a particular time. But Marxist was right about how surplus value will become a new problem.

  4. Posted by soccerguy325, at Reply

    I’m a simple man – I see Hannah, I dislike.

    • Posted by futurestoryteller, at Reply


    • Posted by Jonathan Hijlkema, at Reply

      What does niggered mean? I usually make love to blonde girls, not sure if thats your question though

    • Posted by Daniel D'Souza, at Reply

      +Jonathan Hijlkema Blacks, Jews, and adherants of Islam are inferior. They get niggered all the time.

    • Posted by Jonathan Hijlkema, at Reply

      Daniel D’Souza I see, a racist, how boring, why dont you go educate yourself a bit, see if you can get past your ignorence 😉

  5. Posted by Germán, at Reply

    Stop cuntsplaining please

    • Posted by KL KL, at Reply

      Oh man did it scare you that somebody with a Vagina talked? Or are you actually offended by “womansplaining”?

    • Posted by Benji, at Reply

      Lol bitchsplaining

  6. Posted by Konner L., at Reply

    I love how Hannah is speaking nothing but facts and statistics, and sourcing all her information (not that she has to, this information is very easily accessible) and yet the comments and dislike bar are still stacked against her. People either say that “this proves nothing” or “men deal with the pay gap too” , and while that last quote might be true in some settings, the dominating situation is that on average women get payed less for the same job. Feminism is not “women bitching”, it is not even WOMEN. It is PEOPLE wanting EQUAL pay for dong EQUAL amount of work. But why bother type a truthful comment. Those who agree or disagree with me will continue to do so no matter what facts they are presented with.

    • Posted by nexus1g, at Reply

      1. Google released its statement on the 11th, so even if the video was recorded before Google released its response, they still posted it 7 days after that. At best, that’s grossly irresponsible journalism, and at worst it’s flat out lying.

      2. This finding with Google should be showing us that maybe there is something to those calling BS on the wage gap.

    • Posted by Konner L., at Reply

      nexus1g The finding is with google. You really think every company hiring in all positions has a “gender-blind” eye in the hiring process? This issue wouldn’t be such widely common debate if that were the case.

    • Posted by Aron Liljeskog, at Reply

      You didnt watch the video? THEATRICS, DANCING and INSULTS. Give me a semi-boring monologue and I am satisfied.

    • Posted by nexus1g, at Reply

      Konner, I’m not implying this is true across the board, but with a gender-blind compensation company like Google, there’s no way it can be sexist. However, there’s still a pay difference between men and women. If there was no valid reasons for the pay gap in the rest of the workforce, then Google should have no discernible pay gap, or at least a lessened pay gap.

    • Posted by mike hawk, at Reply

      Konner L. well then you must have been talking about i different video, because that was never demonstrated in this one. all hannah said, and im being generous, was that differences X, Y and Z do not apply, not that we are looking at an apples to apples comparison across the board.

  7. Posted by OodlesOfSpoodles, at Reply


    • Posted by Jon Bones Jones, at Reply

      OodlesOfSpoodles *cuntsplaining

  8. Posted by s_xoxo, at Reply

    I just see a bunch of ignorant trolls making stupid comments instead of sharing their arguments against this video. The pay gap isn’t universal, but it’s stupid to just say it doesn’t exist when companies have settled for paying women less.

    Everything becomes “I’m the feminist I’m right” or “I’m an anti feminist and I’m right” but these issues aren’t black and white.

    • Posted by Sabina Cruz, at Reply

      jetli80 s_xoxo my only argument to that is that these people typically are more like self employed people. They have enough say in what jobs they will take for me to say that, even though I know that a lot of them are managed by a company. This is basically a demand type deal like a modeling agency would be. Certain people will get booked and for more money. This is not a normal job where your cubicle mate might be making more or less than you for the same type of work.

    • Posted by Sabina Cruz, at Reply

      s_xoxo exactly!

    • Posted by s_xoxo, at Reply

      Maddix Roberts
      So just because it’s illegal means it doesn’t happen, MORON? LOL what a stupid argument 😂

    • Posted by Juan Osorno, at Reply

      S xoxo-What about in jobs like construction. Should they be paid the same? Why or why not?

    • Posted by s_xoxo, at Reply

      Juan Osorno if they can get the same job done then yes. If you have a dude working harder, who is lifting more because he’s capable of it then he should of course get more.

  9. Posted by Omen, at Reply

    No sources cited! Why should we trust ANY of what you have to say when 99.9999% of the western world live and work contradictory lives to the nonsense you’re spouting. Hey, if you don’t need to cite your sources, then neither do I.

    • Posted by eval1979 v, at Reply

      Omen even if we say google was a wage gap, that’s just one place. I wonder how much money google donated to Hillary’s campaign? Wait, Wasn’t Hillary company accused for paying women less than men?

    • Posted by o0Theresa0o, at Reply

      You’re not disputing anything. Yes, there are a host of factors (including discrimination), but to acknowledge that is to also acknowledge that the wage gap exists (regardless of the factors).

    • Posted by o0Theresa0o, at Reply

      Can you tell me the time stamp where she says discrimination is the only factor? The point is that the wage gap exists. Period. And that’s a problem (regardless of the reasons).

    • Posted by Davy Crockett, at Reply

      This is the complete tone of the video. She never pointed out any factors aside from discrimination

    • Posted by Omen, at Reply

      @2:59, she says “All else being equal, men will still make more…”
      when she says ALL ELSE BEING EQUAL, that implies the very thing you’re asking me to point out. She doesn’t say it explicitly, but she does IMPLY it VERY HEAVILY. Beyond that she doesn’t outright say it’s the ONLY factor (only implies it).
      Now, time for you to return the favor… show me a timestamp where she points out ANY factor other than gender without immediately adding a “but…” statement as an addendum to the previous one.

      Furthermore, if you say that the “wage gap” (really an EARNINGS GAP), merely existing is a problem, then answer this for me… is it a PROBLEM that someone who works more hours gets a bigger paycheck (assuming they hold the same position obviously)? Is it a PROBLEM that some people are better at negotiating pay? is it a PROBLEM that there’s a myriad of factors that effect pay rates that aren’t even mentioned?

  10. Posted by manhunt48, at Reply

    Jesus Christ TYT, you’ve actually turned into your audience, preemptively dismissing any kind of disagreement with accusations of “troll!”. . . you’ve become a self parody.

    • Posted by PKNHET, at Reply

      tyt could say – the earth is flat
      viewer – no its sphere
      tyt – typical troll

    • Posted by Deus Dex, at Reply

      +PKNHET TYT Fan – Actually it’s an oblate spheroid you alt-right racist misogynist troll. Why do you hate women and minorities?

    • Posted by злюка, at Reply

      *She never called all people that disagree trolls. She said that trolls will disagree without watching further than the first 15 seconds of the video. Get your logic straight OK?*

  11. Posted by BL4CK KN1G8T, at Reply

    Three guesses why Hannah doesn’t have a boyfriend?

    • Posted by Steve Bottrell, at Reply

      If Hannah doesn’t have a boyfriend, its because she doesn’t want one.

    • Posted by Melanoma Trump, at Reply

      PairsOfDuals – this Black Knight trash is a common Trump troll who tries to make friends on Pop Trigger.
      And of course he is trailer trash, some elderly, weedy little hillbilly tapping away in his trailer.

    • Posted by BL4CK KN1G8T, at Reply

      Juan Osorno
      Ding! Ding! Ding!
      We have a winner.

    • Posted by PairsOfDuals, at Reply

      Melanoma Trump Well, I don’t know the truth to all that, but I laughed.

  12. Posted by Ben Shapiro, at Reply

    Get rid of that bimbo. The wage gap is a myth.

    • Posted by Kevin Montrond, at Reply

      Already 2 comments in one minute. She was right. Trolls are furious.

    • Posted by etherraichu, at Reply

      Its pretty funny

    • Posted by k12basic, at Reply

      The wage gap is bull, she knows it, so of course she knew people would immediately fact check her and call her out.

    • Posted by Kal El, at Reply

      +Kevin Montrond “Anybody who disagrees with me is either a troll or racist.”
      -TYT dumb logic

    • Posted by Ben Shapiro, at Reply

      +Kevin Montrond You’re an idiot.

  13. Posted by Roland Taylor, at Reply

    Just when you’re starting to really like Hannah, feminism.

    • Posted by Darren B, at Reply

      Roland Taylor When did you, “start to really like Hannah”?

    • Posted by Roland Taylor, at Reply

      When I stopped watching ThinkTank 😛

  14. Posted by Cerberus Hex, at Reply

    So after 5 mins of research I found out google uses a program to set pay and it doesn’t take gender into account. Humans apparently don’t even set the pay. So this maybe evidence that women just suck at work.

    • Posted by Dyskrasia, at Reply

      Ermahgerd its the devil!

      It’s also a newish documentary.

    • Posted by Meddling Kids, at Reply

      Kids, their crack cocaine and crazy names.

    • Posted by Example !, at Reply

      Cerberus Hex you aren’t going to find their salary algorithm. It’s proprietary software worth a ton of money. Algorithms are a product just like anything else.

    • Posted by Cerberus Hex, at Reply

      @Example Yeah, I didnt think I would get that. I was more looking for the figures they use in the program . So I could get an idea of how it worked.

  15. Posted by acceptjesusorburn, at Reply

    If the wage gap were true then companies would hire only women. Same productivity for cheaper.

    • Posted by Kiel Weiss, at Reply

      futurestoryteller So businesses don’t try to reduce costs and increase profits?

    • Posted by acceptjesusorburn, at Reply

      Kiel Weiss It’s the dumbest thing he’s ever heard.

    • Posted by futurestoryteller, at Reply

      “And if men are more productive than they should make more money.”
      “They aren’t.”
      “So businesses don’t try to reduce costs and increase profits?”
      “It’s the dumbest thing he’s ever heard.”

      …”Logic” according to you two… Great reading comprehension going on here.

    • Posted by acceptjesusorburn, at Reply

      futurestoryteller Shhhh.. No tears. Only dreams.

    • Posted by Kiel Weiss, at Reply

      futurestoryteller See, you don’t seem to understand what reading comprehension means. Your response to him saying businesses look to decrease costs and that if they can get the same productivity for cheaper they will, is to call it the dumbest thing you’ve ever heard. In my response I reiterated his point that businesses are there to make money and that if men were.more productive they should get paid more as in your blanket statement you were either referring to both his points being dumb or not clarifying which of his two points you thought were dumb. You again made a no content blanket statement on my response to which I asked the clarifying question, are you saying businesses aren’t supposed to reduce costs to make more profits as hiring an equally productive workforce foe cheaper would allow them to do.

  16. Posted by Delightful Gentleman, at Reply

    fastest dislike ever ^_^

    • Posted by Delightful Gentleman, at Reply

      lmao David Pakman is a jew as well, how about a non-jewish source you jewish supremacist tard?

    • Posted by futurestoryteller, at Reply

      Sorry, I refuse to appeal to your white supremacy.

    • Posted by Kuba Garczynski, at Reply

      +futurestoryteller correct! I wont accept anything you say because i know its feminazi bullshit <3

    • Posted by Kuba Garczynski, at Reply

      +futurestoryteller im black tho

  17. Posted by YTglobersan Globersan, at Reply

    I was actually expecting some data. smh

    • Posted by Markus Wallin, at Reply

      She’s reapeatedly telling you to Google, and she mentions studies, so you could google for those things she mentioned? Ofc not.

      Anyway, Swedes loves statistics and we have something called SCB, The Statistical Central Bureau, which keeps stats on pretty much everything.
      And in that you can see every plumbers wage, based on the pretty much automated tax system (and other factors). And female plumbers get less money no matter their age compared to the same aged male coworkers. And then you can lok at Swedish studies of paygap, like kids and all that and see that everything Hannah said about the U.S is also true in Sweden, which have a lower pay gap than the U.S. Can still prove it tho.

      Can still also google it. Also, most of SCB’s site is in English as well as English, but I did not find a way to get the actual statistics in Egnlish, but I am sure you are gonna figure that out. Since you already googled so hard on this subject yourself.

    • Posted by Kuba Garczynski, at Reply

      YTglobersan Globersan THERE IS NO DATA IT DOESNT EXIST

  18. Posted by Ariel Mckenzie, at Reply

    The amount of dislikes and ridiculous comments for this video, proves how far we have to go as a country. It’s sad to see this much of a lack of an education. ✊🏾 #resist #letthemknow #womensequality

    • Posted by XantherNight, at Reply

      OodlesOfSpoodles Never did that in any such way, great job at strawmanning an argument though lol, that helps when you don’t have the facts on your side I suppose.

    • Posted by XantherNight, at Reply

      Jordan Coverson unfortunately I feel you’re falling for the trap that more hardcore conservatives lay on the issue of feminism, conflating the 3rd-wavers (who are a loud but TINY tiny fraction) with the rest of those, including myself, who call themselves feminists but don’t ascribe to that more extreme end of the spectrum.

    • Posted by OodlesOfSpoodles, at Reply

      XantherNight you literally defined people who support trump as trolls. also implied the same for fans of dave rubin, claimed he wasnt a liberal even though he definitley is.

    • Posted by Jordan Coverson, at Reply

      Perhaps, but it can be difficult to make that distinction.

      Take Islam and BLM.
      I believe the majority of Muslims are peaceful. However, due to multiple factors, a terrorist extremist group has broken off representing a minority among Muslims. They are louder, and receive more attention than the majority.
      BLM however, almost across the board, loudly advocates for segregation, hate, and perpetual victimology. Can we really say that the outspoken BLM advocates are the minority of the group?

      Because 3rd wave is the loudest currently, that is what feminism is tied to. That is not how it started, nor is it what it truly stands for, but that is what it is now. It may change in the future, maybe one day we will see a 4th wave. Only time will tell. One can stand for women’s rights, and be against feminism at the same time.

      I am still unclear as to what rights women are lacking in our western society.