Hey Scott Pruitt, Grab A Dictionary And Look Up False Equivalence | Soshal Network, Social Circle Connection

Hey Scott Pruitt, Grab A Dictionary And Look Up False Equivalence

0

Enjoyed the video ladies check these swimsuits out

Anti-Science Profiteer/ EPA Head Scott Pruitt needs to seek out "incorrect equivalence." Organized by NerdAlert's Kim Horcher. See much more TYT Facebook originals at

Comply with Kim Horcher on Twitter:

Like Kim Horcher on Facebook:

Share Your Comments

66 comments

  1. Posted by Angel Rojo, at Reply

    Right-wingers flee Science and Logic, as if, it were kryptonite. Call them out on it. Reality is our Strength and their weakness.

    • Posted by Dragon1717, at Reply

      Remember folks, science that doesn’t fit with the liberal agenda is not science! Also, liberals can ignore biology and science when convenient!

    • Posted by klo schuessel, at Reply

      what are you talking about?

  2. Posted by l_AM_ONLlNE, at Reply

    False equivalence examples:

    white crime = black crime

    non-Islamic terrorism = Islamic terrorism

    women = men

    • Posted by Angel Rojo, at Reply

      It doesn’t seem you understand what the meaning of false equivalency means.

    • Posted by Angel Rojo, at Reply

      *False equivalence* is a logical fallacy in which two opposing arguments appear to be logically equivalent when in fact they are not. This fallacy is categorized as a fallacy of inconsistency.

    • Posted by Ronin Dave, at Reply

      nothing to do with this video

  3. Posted by TriHard Kappa, at Reply

    Kim>Hannah/Hassan

    • Posted by CarbonAtom14, at Reply

      Anyone>Hannah

  4. Posted by Daniel harvey The chocolate kyle kulinski, at Reply

    I just don’t understand what people think scientists would gain from lying about climate change. ……. just so stupid

    • Posted by eatmorenachos, at Reply

      …and they somehow think those on the oil and coal industry payroll aren’t just doing so to make a buck.

    • Posted by CarbonAtom14, at Reply

      The awesome $28k a year from the gov’ment, duh.

    • Posted by Ronin Dave, at Reply

      +eatmorenachos these geniuses think they’ve got the whole thing figured out – that the majority of scientists are all in cahoots with each other to get more grant money

    • Posted by whyamimrpink78, at Reply

      The scientists are not lying, the media and politicians are misrepresenting them. You will be hard pressed to find scientists making a claim that climate change is a threat and we need the government to stop it.

      Kim is also not a scientist.

    • Posted by Daniel harvey The chocolate kyle kulinski, at Reply

      not true

  5. Posted by Luna vampire, at Reply

    WOW, this guy doesn’t know anything about math. Can someone please make Scott Pruitt or anyone who believes that climate change is a hoax debate with a scientist and record and write about their argument and see what evidence that use to back up they claim?

    • Posted by Ste H, at Reply

      I think that the usual right wing argument begins with sticking their fingers in their ears and yelling “Nerr, nerrr, can’t hear ya!”…
      That’s the general impression that I get at least.

    • Posted by Angel Rojo, at Reply

      Bingo! This should be a requirement for all politicians. They should have to produce a report (in their own words) outlining their Reasoning for their positions and providing evidence to support their claims.

    • Posted by torchandhammer, at Reply

      Give him a bunch of money and he’ll say whatever you want.

  6. Posted by Hal Jordan, at Reply

    Do conservatives not understand that they also need clean water, clean air, and stable temperatures to survive?

    • Posted by whyamimrpink78, at Reply

      We also need a strong economy. It goes both ways.

    • Posted by Hal Jordan, at Reply

      We can invest in cleaner sources of energy, and create more jobs that way, like China is doing. Also, there’s not point in having an economy, if it’s on a dead planet.

    • Posted by OutlawRebel117, at Reply

      hudsle That’s idiotic! Not about the creatures, but the idea that we could live on equal terms as them. Our biology is different from theirs we would have to undergo a massive metabolic and physical metamorphosis to even qualify for living as they do.

    • Posted by hudsle, at Reply

      Thats kinda my point. The argument by the current EPA chief, based on logic used by deniers, is so flawed, they probably would believe something that idiotic. Or did you actually think I was suggesting we evolve into tube worms, and hang out around underwater volcanic vents?

    • Posted by OutlawRebel117, at Reply

      hudsle In my defense I just barely woke up. I wasn’t sure who was suggesting what in your comment.

  7. Posted by Robert Fancyman, at Reply

    I do not believe that gravity exists. Therefore, there is no worldwide consensus and schools have to teach the debate.

    • Posted by 2ndviolin, at Reply

      Robert Fancyman … while we all gently float of into space.

    • Posted by humboldthammer, at Reply

      Gravity is an incoherent magnetic field distribution. Is that the debate you expected?

    • Posted by Dragon1717, at Reply

      Gravity is settled.
      Climate Science is unsettled.

  8. Posted by Ronin Dave, at Reply

    What’s interesting is the conspiracy minded rightwingers who readily believe there’s a satanic pedophiliac pizzeria based on some words in an email that they assume are code words and who also believe the government faked Sandy Hook because an evil government would rather fake people’s deaths than actually kill them to further their nefarious world dominating schemes somehow cannot fathom the far more simple scheme of the anti-climate change people who just want to continue making money from fossil fuels and antiquated technology. No, instead they believe another ridiculous theory that the majority of the world’s scientists are colluding together to perpetuate a hoax because they want grant money or something about reptilian Illuminati. These people are beyond help.

    • Posted by barbourgirl78, at Reply

      Ronin Dave 🙊😂😂😂

  9. Posted by QWERTY 123, at Reply

    Happy Independence Day, f*ckfaces!

    Celebrate the Independence Day of America, the No. 1 nation on Earth!

    That is, the No. 1 nation in mass shootings, porn production, failed wars overseas, out of wedlock (bastard) kids, unwed teen pregnancy, murder rates, drug abuse, gang warfare, sodomy, low IQ’s, obesity, climate denial, sexual imagery, prostitution, divorce, and just being cringe! YAY!

    Share your thoughts.

    • Posted by Sandra Snow-Balvert, at Reply

      I’m ok with the porn though I think that should be added into the plus category 😀

    • Posted by QWERTY 123, at Reply

      + Sandra Snow Balvert

      Why?

    • Posted by Sandra Snow-Balvert, at Reply

      because watching porn doesn’t hurt anyone and it’s fun to get you into the mood. There is no real downside to the industry as long as it’s properly regulated.

    • Posted by QWERTY 123, at Reply

      + Sandra Snow Balvert

      It causes impotence in men, as well as a fall in testosterone levels.

    • Posted by Sandra Snow-Balvert, at Reply

      no it doesn’t hun all the studies done on that have proven no correlation at all.

  10. Posted by Becky Kovac, at Reply

    Global warming is a hoax.

    • Posted by Ronin Dave, at Reply

      troll is a troll

    • Posted by Becky Kovac, at Reply

      Ronin Dave thanks libtard

    • Posted by Jameson Sotta, at Reply

      You’re an opinion that your parents shouldn’t have had.

    • Posted by Hal Jordan, at Reply

      Your partner’s orgasm is a hoax.

  11. Posted by liedetector101, at Reply

    97% of the people in Afghanistan believe people that don’t believe in the Quran should be beheaded

    • Posted by Ronin Dave, at Reply

      good for them! nothing to do with this video

    • Posted by barbourgirl78, at Reply

      Ronin Dave 😂😂😂Ikr

    • Posted by Hal Jordan, at Reply

      “Deflect, deflect, deflect.”

      – Typical Trumpanzee

  12. Posted by Asrahn, at Reply

    Note that the 3% of scientists aren’t even denying it; they are just not 100% positive like the others.

    • Posted by Michael Campbell, at Reply

      What of the 97% who weren’t even aware they agreed with it?

    • Posted by Heath Bilbrey, at Reply

      There is no 97% consensus. And even if there were. Science is not conducted via consensus. The Cook et al. so-called 97% study has been completely debunked.

    • Posted by Hal Jordan, at Reply

      You’re a moron, Heath. Scientific consensus is indeed a thing.

  13. Posted by Rock Johnson, at Reply

    I wonder if TYT will do a video on the British muslim student union leader who said she would like to oppress white people and praised the idea of an Islamic takeover. She also said friendship between men and women is un-Islamic and Britain’s anti-terror prevent strategy is “disastrous” as well as “racist.” And liberals still don’t understand why people have a problem with muslims.

    • Posted by Hal Jordan, at Reply

      Lets not talk about the greatest threat to the planet. Talk about some random Muslim person instead.

    • Posted by Rock Johnson, at Reply

      Hal Jordan Islam is the greatest threat to the planet.

    • Posted by Rock Johnson, at Reply

      Hal Jordan What do you think the greatest threat to the planet is?

    • Posted by Sandra Snow-Balvert, at Reply

      how about global warming? And islam isn’t a threat idiot. It’s a differing Ideal than what you are used to. When you compare the numbers of muslims in the world vs the ones that are actually a threat the population is less than 1%. Do some freaking research and stop looking for a boogie man to make you feel better about the bad choices you’ve made in life.

  14. Posted by SpurnOfHumanity, at Reply

    Kim is a hundred times less cringey than Hannah.

  15. Posted by Millennial Mom, at Reply

    Get it girl 🙌🔥

    • Posted by Em Em, at Reply

      you’ll be home soon then ill GIVE IT

  16. Posted by Jason Vegan, at Reply

    Hiya, Scott! Also look up “Tool” in urban dictionary. It highly pertains to yourself.

  17. Posted by ronishamay, at Reply

    Scott pruitt, the anti-environment head of the Environmental Protection Agency.

  18. Posted by GreedEU, at Reply

    *Kim!! <3*

    • Posted by Em Em, at Reply

      E> !!miK

  19. Posted by Hugh Janus, at Reply

    >The science is settled on global warming. We know CO2 is the primary driver of climate.

    >Give us more money to study climate science even though it’s settled science and we can predict the temperature 100 years from now!

    • Posted by captain bigballs, at Reply

      +Hugh Janus. Shut up, dumbass.

    • Posted by yzeew w, at Reply

      We aren’t using money to see if global warming is real because until new information comes that overturns over a hundred and fifty years of experimentation the assumption is that it does happen. The money is going to have us learn about how far towards the edge we can do unscathed and even if global warming had no effect studying our planet would still be a worthwhile pursuit.

  20. Posted by Atlantean Fox_14, at Reply

    thats like saying the flag of france is actually black orange and green