Media Coverage Very Different For Muslim Terror Victims | Soshal Network, Social Circle Connection

Media Coverage Very Different For Muslim Terror Victims


Enjoyed the video ladies check these swimsuits out

Donald Trump's Twitter as well as media coverage is drastically various and when terror targets are muslim. Exactly how fear mongering brings about physical violence like #finsburypark and also #nabrahassanen. Hosted by Hasan Piker. See a lot more TYT Facebook originals at

Follow Hasan Piker on Twitter:

Adhere to Hasan Piker on Instagram:

Share Your Comments


  1. Posted by quaxk, at Reply

    You mean like when Muslims do it you don’t cover it at all and pretend it never happened?

    • Posted by Dale H, at Reply

      you’ve been brainwashed into thinking what crowder and jones tell you is true. they cover false incidents.

    • Posted by Dumb Cunt, at Reply

      Actually most TYT “trolls” actually do research into these topics.

    • Posted by Banjo Pink, at Reply

      DC: _”People that hate TYT are getting top comments lmao!”_
      Yup. Virtually no-one is defending this bunk. Just gotta work on those real-time dislikes now.

    • Posted by Green Square, at Reply

      quaxk make a list of all terrorist attacks in the world.

  2. Posted by Ana Kasparian's Nose, at Reply

    TYT cant go a week without defending islam and vilifying all other religions. tyt is the Brietbart/Fox of the left.

    • Posted by tim van der velde, at Reply

      +Hotcakes ISIS is a result of bad Islam, not vise versa; from the Philipines to North Africa Muslim militia are conducting genocides but TYT ‘s fans are more concerned about menspreading

    • Posted by lil'sucky, at Reply

      real leftists would never allow religion!!!!

    • Posted by A.I Varouqa, at Reply

      Give one example, one link to just one video on “vilifying all other religions”

  3. Posted by Ivan Ezell, at Reply

    I want Trump himself to get on national television and explain why Saudi Arabia isn’t on that travel ban list

    • Posted by Ivan Ezell, at Reply

      Banjo Pink I was trying to be sarcastic but I personally believe it’s because of some business dealings he has with them

    • Posted by facefister69, at Reply

      How embarrassing, you’d probably have known why if you watched the news.

    • Posted by Trollop 7, at Reply

      Ivan Ezell
      When did you have your first sarcasm?

    • Posted by Ivan Ezell, at Reply

      facefister69 LOL I did know I was trying to be sarcastic

    • Posted by facefister69, at Reply

      Clearly you have no idea what you are talking about, you are the perfect target to be brainwashed by these charlatans…

  4. Posted by Steven Drumm, at Reply

    Hassan FYI – One isn’t a racist for being anti-Islam, because Islam isn’t a race!

    • Posted by TheUhhoh, at Reply

      +The Progressive Atheist

      I don’t disagree with you on that account, but do believe a distinction to be made between racism and Islamophobia.

      I say this because the accusation is often used against people with legitimate criticisms of Islam, that have not taken any form of hateful action against them. You cannot reasonably assume these people to be racists simply because a minority group tends to practice the religion, as too often is this used as a method to disarm legitimate talking points before a conversation can even begin.

    • Posted by The Progressive Atheist, at Reply

      CultOfDusty: “Liberals, stop saying it’s racist to criticize Islam, because Islam isn’t a race you idiots!”

      Also CultOfDusty: “Why is it that Obama only ever invites Muslims over to the White House, and never white people?”

    • Posted by Mathieu Poulin, at Reply

      I think it’s also rather racist to criticize the NRA.

  5. Posted by atombond, at Reply

    Attacks against Muslims this year in western democracies: 7

    Attacks by Muslims this year against western democracies: 458


    • Posted by Axel xXx, at Reply

      Uhhhhhh ISIS isn’t apart of Islam so it doesn’t count REEEEE

    • Posted by Sinessa, at Reply

      +Johnny the Boy
      So now that you’ve had your little emotional outburst, do you have anything substantive or specific to say about the article?

    • Posted by Truth, at Reply

      Muslims have done nothing compared to right-wingers.
      Ki11ed millions of Iraqis and displaced many hundred of thousands
      War in Afghanistan (100,000+ dead)
      War in Pakistan
      Vietnam War (millions dead)

      As you can see, right-wingers are far more insane than anyone else. People like Spence flirt with the idea of doing a black genocide. Democrats are far more peaceful than you devils.

    • Posted by atombond, at Reply

      Sinessa+ let me show you how dumb you are and what you just revealed. Right wing terror attacks make up approx 75% of all domestic terrorism, lets assume they’re all whites, which make up 75% of the US population. So its proportional.

      Muslims make up 0.8% of the US population yet are responsible for 25% of all terrorism in US. So thank you for highlighting that Muslims yet again are by far the most dangerous religious group on earth.

  6. Posted by Cedric M, at Reply

    TYT Reports this as if they don’t do the same thing!

    • Posted by CaptainRay, at Reply

      +Kitkat Emm Mate, you’re deluding yourself there.

    • Posted by Kitkat Emm, at Reply

      when do they ever tiptoe around it? show proof of this. link me videos where they do this before making such a claim. you see people who basically know nothing about what they’re talking about never have the balls to back up their claims with evidence. they make a statement that is easily provable or disprovable but when challenged to do so they back away with some generalized response that isn’t as easily debunked and then go SEE? YOU CAN’T DISPROVE IT.

    • Posted by Time Lord, at Reply

      Alright, I can prove it. Every time a white person does something against a minority they usually put “white” in the title. Yet when a Muslim does something FOR ISLAM they never put Muslim in the title. Never. During the 1 year anniversary video of the Pulse night club shooting NOT ONE TIME did they mention the words “Islamic terrorism” or “Muslim” the entire time. Actually, they had a black woman on the panel talking about “gay people of color being victimized” as if the shooter was a white person. Not even wanting to acknowledge that it was a brown Muslim who killed the brown gay people. You say I have no evidence? I got YEARS of evidence. Cuck.

  7. Posted by Taran Singh, at Reply

    I agree more with Bill Maher on Islam as a progressive.Its not just terrorism, its has lots of wrongs explain this:
    Why is female genital mutation associated with predominately Islamic countries?
    Why are Israeli’s banned in Islamic countries?
    why are atheist like myself killed for blasphemy in islamic countries?
    Why are the countries who have least respect for women and LGBTQ rights predominately Islamic?
    Its has its problem not addressing them just because you’d be a “racist” is everything wrong with liberals today

    • Posted by 18Darkside, at Reply

      None of that is just a Christian thing though

    • Posted by Taran Singh, at Reply

      Did I say Christianity is any better? lol Who says Christianity hasn’t had its share of crap but in the end they reformed and are some of the most civilized countries in the world
      I would ask you if you’d live as any of those minories, LGBTQ or as women in either Switzerland or Pakistan?
      None of the Islamic countries stand for liberal values.

    • Posted by UNLebanon, at Reply

      +Taran Singh, Because Bill Maher is using the logical fallacy of “correlation equals causation.” The countries that have high degrees of those bad things you listed are coincidentally Muslim, but Islam is not the cause of those bad things. If they were, they we would see those bad things in Indonesia (180 million), India (150 million), Pakistan (135 million), Bangladesh (125 million), and China (80 million): the top 5 Muslim countries in the world (FYI: the first four countries contain more than 50% of the world’s Muslim populace). We would also see an absence of the bad things you listed from regional countries that are predominately non-Muslim. For example, Eritrea is a predominately Christian country that has more female genital mutilation than its surrounding Muslim majority countries.

      Using the Bill Maher tactic, I could make the Catholic religion sound like a religion that promotes drug trafficking, gang violence, and guerilla warfare by singling out predominately Catholic countries with these problems like Nicaragua, Guatemala, and Columbia and ignoring predominately Catholic countries that lack these problems like Ireland, France, and Italy.

    • Posted by Taran Singh, at Reply

      UNLebanon that’s a fair enough point. But what Islam needs is secular voices instead of extremist, primitive ones to make it reform and without a central authority it isn’t easy. But problems of women, LGBTQ or some minorities are even present in most liberal Islamic countries like Malaysia to some extent.

    • Posted by UNLebanon, at Reply

      +Taran Singh, I agree that we need voices other than the extremist ones. However, unlike other religions, Islam does not have a pope or central spokesperson. It is a very decentralized religion, especially in western countries. There are organizations like CAIR, USCMO, and the Islamic Society of North America who could be the moderate voices you are looking for, but the media seldom gives these groups a voice… peaceful Muslim groups are bad for sensationalist journalism.

  8. Posted by mick stot, at Reply

    Is there a problem with being anti Islam?

    • Posted by Alexander B, at Reply

      Anti- Islam? No. Anti-Muslim? Yes.

    • Posted by Waqar Qureshi, at Reply

      Code Slinger I dont know how that argument involves me an atheist. I’m just defending and achknowledging free speech

    • Posted by mick stot, at Reply

      UNLebanon…Islam is an ideology yet you conflate it with race, sexual orientation and ethnicity etc. Are you not anti anything?

    • Posted by mick stot, at Reply

      Alexander B…a Muslim is someone who holds Islamic views.

  9. Posted by Scott Wilson, at Reply

    Hassan is such a cuck

    • Posted by Scott Wilson, at Reply

      Rohan Hyatt trans trump supporter, he succeeded at all of those things. Now he just needs to silence the press and kill protesters

    • Posted by Rohan Hyatt, at Reply

      Scott Wilson okay, I sense sarcasm πŸ˜‰

    • Posted by Scott Wilson, at Reply

      Rohan Hyatt not at all I start gender therapy in August… there are a ton of LGBT Trumpers and Trumpettes

    • Posted by Rohan Hyatt, at Reply

      Scott Wilson I know there are LGBT Trump supporters. Not a ton…but they do exist. The “kill protesters” looked like a give away that everything you’re saying is just joke. Like I’m imagining that you’re a Pepe behind a computer screen right now

  10. Posted by git user53, at Reply

    Hasan-you don’t know your history bud: Muslims are known throughout history for being liars and murders. Just look at Spain in the 15th and 16th century and what Muslims and Moors did to them.You cannot put enough makeup on that pig.

    • Posted by git user53, at Reply

      WWZenaDo Reformation…

    • Posted by WWZenaDo, at Reply

      Christian fundamentalism, especially in Africa…

    • Posted by git user53, at Reply

      WWZenaDo Armenian Genocide

  11. Posted by Denesh Chopra, at Reply

    even though an enormous amounts of muslims are killed by american bombs, and not even a fraction of that have died due to terrorists that make up a small amount of people in the musilim community, people still feel the need to say don’t cover it when innocent muslim teens die.

    • Posted by ABCD ABCD, at Reply

      Denesh Chopra Theres a cost for every war, stop being deluded

    • Posted by asdg199, at Reply

      I agree. TYT dosent cover those stories, they just complain that others dont.

    • Posted by Fahad Abuloghod, at Reply

      ABCD ABCD ABCD ABCD yes, there’s a cost for every war but not every war the us waged in the Middle East was justified or necessary (Iraq war).

    • Posted by SirBullet754, at Reply

      who cares about muslims?

    • Posted by Denesh Chopra, at Reply

      ABCD ABCD, well darn it, you sound so ignorant. maybe your just bit young and you don’t realize you’re saying something half thought through. if it was a war not worth fighting, then all the people that died was a tragedy.

  12. Posted by Mark12 Strang, at Reply

    The Young Turks didn’t mention that the murder of the girl was an illegal immigrant.

    • Posted by Jan Chowdhury, at Reply

      Infinite Fantasy I’m not comparing the two. Your ideology compares the two. If not, then you’re a hypocrite. I don’t think any murder is acceptable, whether someone kills an illegal immigrant or a soldier, a life is a life. Something you fail to see

    • Posted by Infinite Fantasy, at Reply

      Jan Chowdhury you obvy dont know my ideology. The original post mustve went right over your head because no one is comparing deaths. He’s saying that the murderer is an illegal not the girl.

    • Posted by Richard S, at Reply

      Jan Chowdhury I thought the commenter was implying by not menching that info it creates a false narrative. was this girls murder really a case of white supremacy or a just illegal immigrants killing Americans.? telling the story with half truths is very disrespectful to the young girl

    • Posted by Mark12 Strang, at Reply

      They should have mentioned it is a few words, but they want to protect illegal immigrants. Had the murder been a Republican and fanatic Trump supporter, they would blame Trump personally. That’s a double standard.

  13. Posted by Rusty Osgood, at Reply

    In the case of Bill Maher this is a false equivocation….Anti Islam is not the same as anti Muslim!!!!!! You called Bill a racist?! Since when is Islam a race you fucktard? It isn’t terrorist that flame the fires and widen the gaps and energize the right, it’s BS commentary like this that fails to distinguish criticism from bigotry. Islam is a fucked religion (as are all). ISIS does what they do, terrorists do what they do because of ISLAM and their fucked ideology. Why should Islam get a pass? Why should cartoonist be shamed? Why should countries ban criticism and specific cartoons of Muhammad? The terrorists win because they manage to get people like you to condemn people like Bill Maher who, by the way, made an entire movie condemning Christianity…did you miss that? Goddammit I love TYT but this makes me want to unsubscribe permanently….

    • Posted by Rusty Osgood, at Reply

      I am not sure I understand what you mean by “Policy”… Maher’s movie is called “Religulous”.

    • Posted by Ex0dus111, at Reply

      “Criticizing Islam is not criticizing Muslims” Except that it almost always is.

      Sure, you can get into a theological debate with a Muslim about say how the development of Islam has moved away from accepting influences from other sources like Greek philosophy, which was prominent among Islamic teachings a few hundred years ago, and onto Salafism and Wahhabi-ism of today.

      But the minute you say, oh this part is nonsense, you are attacking what a self-proclaimed Muslim believes in. And what Maher is doing is far worse, he is simply equating Islam with suicide bombs, which is insanity.

      It would be like me addressing a person from the US going, Oh you are from the US? You like dropping bombs on people then? Blowing up weddings and children? That’s all you people do after all.

    • Posted by Rusty Osgood, at Reply

      This is not about the history or theology of the religion and nobody suggested it was so why even bring this up? The ideological points stand logically independent of their history.

      Mar has NEVER equated “Muslims” with suicide bombs….any more than you did just now. Please cite this (independently with full context) and I will grant it otherwise you are as guilty as the maker of this video, not knowing what you are talking about, jumping to conclusions or you have an agenda. Since you don’t use your real name, you may be the maker of this video for all I know.

      You completely missed (or ignored) the point. NO RELIGION can claim that all followers believe the same exact things. Every member holds their own views and beliefs on many issues. In this context, many people are Muslim without holding extreme “Islamist” ideas.

      Islam has no central authority but does have doctrine. There are certain beliefs that ARE widely held and widely accepted withn certain populations. These widely held beliefs (based on poll data) and the central doctrine (as interpreted) are the focus of Maher’s criticism….and indeed ARE bad ideas. We can attack said bad ideas without attacking people who follow the (vaguely defined) religion because many people (in the West for example) do not follow or believe in said bad ideas…they are not “Islamist” as Maher and Newaz defined them.

      Maher and Harris cited polls. They cited data about specific beliefs held by people. Statistically significant numbers of people who hold certain ridiculous beliefs and this is what is criticized. The beliefs are consistent with the doctrine. Thus, Islam IS a bad idea…

      Maher cites the poll data which shows that many believe women and gay people are inferior. They believe non-Muslims are inferior. They believe in death for apostasy. They believe in Sharia law, they believe that cartoons of Muhammad should be banned. Rather than criticize these bad ideas, many focus in attacking any criticism of the religion as “Islamaphobic” rather than argue against these bad ideas and educating the people who hold them, they focus their lasers on the criticism…as if somehow the criticizers are the enemy and not the bad ideas themselves. These people are just as dangerous as the terrorists themselves…many of them just cowards…afraid to let their true beliefs be known…

      Listening to an edited clip (I argue edited for intellectually dishonest purposes) then drawing conclusions and calling someone a bigot is stupid at best or an intellectually dishonest deception by someone with a (perhaps hidden) agenda at worst…it sucks any way you look at it.

    • Posted by Ex0dus111, at Reply

      “Mar has NEVER equated “Muslims” with suicide bombs..”

      You JUST saw the clip.. JUST NOW. In this very video you are commenting on… Amazing…

    • Posted by Rusty Osgood, at Reply

      Yea…Shows how much you pay attention….even after I suggested that the clip was out of context and much worse, the word “Muslim” is not mentioned in the discussion on CNN… You hear and see what you want to and this is why TYT is irresponsible to allow anyone to say these things about Maher without doing their due dilligence. Shame on you and shame on TYT…

      In order to understand complicated things you first have to think.

      Understand this: A Muslim is not the same as an Islamist. Muslim is not a religion….nor is it a race. This is the real basic stuff. I will save the more complicated stuff for after you have the basics down.

  14. Posted by Jacob Sartorious, at Reply

    Any attack on a Mosque in Europe is fair game, it’s European land.

    • Posted by Xarriable, at Reply

      Jacob Sartorious that also means any white in america, australia, new zealand and africa should be killed…?

    • Posted by SirBullet754, at Reply

      Xarriable- shut up you, I was going to reply to your comment from before but I accidentally deleted the original one while trying to edit it. Anyway, as I said, Europeans hate muslims, have zero sympathy for them. so there, that will never change.

    • Posted by Shain Miah, at Reply

      SirBullet754 …….. Sir …. really ? Bullet …. really ?
      and whats with the 24 …….do you think Jack Bauer would agree with you ????? ok buddy …….

    • Posted by Alexa Saperstein, at Reply

      therightway the muslims already feel that way and regularly murder christians for fun in the middle east…in ALL muslim majority countries, dumbass

  15. Posted by James Ryan, at Reply

    Bill Maher is not racist. He doesn’t dislike Arabs, he dislikes the religion. You’re a liar, and manipulator.

    • Posted by Dr. Gavagai Academy, at Reply

      i wish u still here Carl , i miss u πŸ™

    • Posted by SidheKnight, at Reply

      Not to mention, he actually supports moderate, liberal muslims who try to reform the religion from within, like Ayaan Hirsi Ali and Maajid Nawaz, and has invited them to his show many times.

  16. Posted by andrew valer, at Reply

    The hypocrisy is strong in this one

    • Posted by Zachar Art, at Reply

      But it’s not though stupid

  17. Posted by XIPHIASCDXX, at Reply

    Radical Christian Terrorism.
    When Timothy McVeigh blew up the Oklahoma City Federal Building [with a daycare full of kids] the media immediately tried to assume _Muslims_, and were reluctant to admit it was a down-home, corn-fed white supremacist. Since when have white people been above violence? US Cavalry slaughtered entire villages full of women & children, the race of ‘peace’… Now they bomb villages full of women and children on the other side of the world…

    • Posted by Blind Spot, at Reply

      +The Worm
      i agree that christiany lost the battle in all fronts and succumbed to secularism.
      and, really funny while you try to defend them. you yourself dont aware that what you do is a hypocritical act.
      muslims all over the world already said this over and over that those ISIS and Al Qaida are not muslims, despite whatever those maniacs have claimed to be.
      and listen to your media and most of your fellowmen said, EXACTLY!!, they INSISTED and say that those crazy maniacs “the true muslims”, they defend them, just like you do right now, defend them, your christians fellow.

      am i lie? i dont know you, tell me. im exactly copy what your media play to use it againts you (not you personally) so you can taste your own medicine.

    • Posted by XIPHIASCDXX, at Reply

      The Worm
      Did you not see that Kentucky just passed a law allowing public schools to teach the bible? That’s not secular…

  18. Posted by Jasminewynja, at Reply

    TyT’s narrative:
    1) Muslims kill dozens of random innocent people in the West because white people provoke them. Bottom line is, the blame is on white people collectively.
    2) A deranged maniac who hates Muslims and happens to be white drives in to a mob of Muslims outside a Mosque and kills a bunch of them because white racism. Bottom line, the blame is on white people collectively.

    And some people are questioning when viewers are calling out TyT on their blatant racism towards white.

    • Posted by Justin-Timothy Frater, at Reply

      Jasminewynja Don’t pretend like you don’t know the answer

    • Posted by Blind Spot, at Reply

      “white people provoke them”
      what you mean by word provoke here?
      why white people provoke them?

    • Posted by Jasminewynja, at Reply

      *+Justin-Timothy Frater* I will keep giving you the benefit of doubt when it comes to if you are a racist or not. That’s why I am asking. Is that a mistake from my side?

    • Posted by Jasminewynja, at Reply

      *+Blind Spot* You have to ask TyT why they have this kind of twisted narrative. I am just pointing at something sick within TyT.

  19. Posted by JESUStheATHEIST1, at Reply

    the girl was killed by an illegal Latino….nice try brown Fabio.

    • Posted by Zohm B, at Reply

      You do know that Latino is now considered white. That is, when they commit a crime.

    • Posted by SaiyanZ Rage, at Reply

      Zohm B lol i know right

    • Posted by rencrow, at Reply

      He was a trump supporter.

  20. Posted by TigerMeadows, at Reply

    Sorry, I’m not watching any Hasan vids. Love, long time heavy user of Young Turks.

    • Posted by Andreas karlsson, at Reply

      Actually no, he’s talking about mainstream media in general, he used some british media as examples to make his point yes. Didnt pay 100% focus during the video but can you point out when he suggested that BBC is fascist?

      So you’re saying that the images he provided of headlines of the terror attack in London was fake?

      Also, I said TigerMeadows is judging him by his appearance, not people in general. I believe you know how to read so lets not put words in each others mouths.

    • Posted by Anthony Fradley, at Reply

      TigerMeadows I understand that, my point was more so that you likely dislike him for previous videos where’s he’s shown similar levels of poor research and obvious bias. Which didn’t change in this video

    • Posted by Anthony Fradley, at Reply

      Andreas karlsson he slandered British media outlets such as the BBC for reporting terror attacks as they always do. That is awful journalism. Google the BBCs coverage of the Muslim attacks, they are virtually the same. The images are true but to suggest our media are biased and are actively reporting the attack differently deserves to be called out for being propaganda

      You suggested he doesn’t like him because of his skin colour when he’s clearly awful at his job. There can be other reasons for disliking someone of colour

    • Posted by Andreas karlsson, at Reply

      Umm no? Never once did I mention or hint at his skin color being the issue.. Looks is so much more than the color of ones skin…..

      Also did you purposely ignore half my comment or just … stoopid?