SHOCKING New Tactic To Deal With Airline Passenger Meltdowns | Soshal Network, Social Circle Connection

SHOCKING New Tactic To Deal With Airline Passenger Meltdowns

0
Warning: mysql_query(): Access denied for user 'vu2007'@'localhost' (using password: NO) in /var/www/virtual/cakafeteusa.com/htdocs/wp-content/plugins/jvzoo-ad-manager-v1/jvzoo-ad-manager.php on line 333 Warning: mysql_query(): A link to the server could not be established in /var/www/virtual/cakafeteusa.com/htdocs/wp-content/plugins/jvzoo-ad-manager-v1/jvzoo-ad-manager.php on line 333 Warning: mysql_fetch_array() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /var/www/virtual/cakafeteusa.com/htdocs/wp-content/plugins/jvzoo-ad-manager-v1/jvzoo-ad-manager.php on line 335

Enjoyed the video ladies check these swimsuits out

Korean Air has decided it will now train it's flight attendants to use tasers and it will hire more male flight attendants to subdue unruly passengers. Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian of The Young Turks discuss this shocking new tactic by Korean Air. Tell us what you think in the comment section below.

Read more here:

"Korean Air Lines said it will allow crew members to "readily use stun guns" to manage violent passengers, and hire more male flight attendants, after coming in for criticism from U.S. singer Richard Marx over its handling of a recent incident.

The new crew guidelines, announced on Tuesday following the Dec. 20 incident, will also include more staff training, use of the latest device to tie up a violent passenger, and the banning of passengers with a history of unruly behavior.

Men account for about one-tenth of Korean Air flight attendants, and the carrier said it will try to have at least one male on duty in the cabin for each flight."*

Hosts: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian
Cast: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian

***

The Largest Online News Show in the World. Hosted by Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian. LIVE STREAMING weekdays 6-8pm ET.

Young Turk (n), 1. Young progressive or insurgent member of an institution, movement, or political party. 2. Young person who rebels against authority or societal expectations. (American Heritage Dictionary)

Download audio and video of the full two hour show on-demand + the members-only post game show by becoming a member at . Your membership supports the day to day operations and is vital for our continued success and growth.

Get The Young Turks Mobile App Today!

Download the iOS version here:

Download the Android version here:

Share Your Comments

64 comments

  1. Posted by Imagineth, at Reply

    TYT caters to the agenda of Islamic Jihad. Don’t be stupid. Any idiot can
    see it. TYT is a hate group against Whites and Jews.

    • Posted by Yoshi Garcia, at Reply

      +Imagineth 😂😂😂

    • Posted by Imagineth, at Reply

      +Mike Ehrmantraut Being white doesn’t make one intelligent, snowflake.

    • Posted by Yoshi Garcia, at Reply

      +Imagineth True.

    • Posted by erzan, at Reply

      The police are not even sufficiently trained and make mistakes with a
      Taser. You think civilians are?

  2. Posted by WooferJr, at Reply

    Why so many dislikes?

    • Posted by Mike Ehrmantraut, at Reply

      WooferJr the early troll catches the thumbs-down

  3. Posted by ice ninja, at Reply

    I’d pay to see Alex Jones and Cenk being forced to sit together on a flight

    • Posted by ice ninja, at Reply

      cheeky kunt lol

    • Posted by arithsem, at Reply

      WERE HAVING A REASONABLE DISCUSSION – CENK

    • Posted by minsmama, at Reply

      +Chunk Yogurt
      No way. Alex Jones is a cowardly punk.

  4. Posted by valhala56, at Reply

    I would prefer if Passengers were thrown off the plane…..in mid flight, I
    would push them out myself.

    • Posted by Bam Westy, at Reply

      You’d die too at that altitude

    • Posted by valhala56, at Reply

      WTF are you talking about, that is the same altitude as Everest you Twit.

    • Posted by donttakeitseriously, at Reply

      You’d get sucked out of the fucking plane

    • Posted by valhala56, at Reply

      Then my troubles will be over, no?

  5. Posted by Robert Flury, at Reply

    It’s “toxic” masculinity until you need some muscle.

    • Posted by mike hawk, at Reply

      Robert Flury feminism ends where a flat tire begins.

    • Posted by HelenaJ, at Reply

      No it ends when those muscles are turned against us especially just as a
      control tool. Pretty east concept.

  6. Posted by Cockcheese Maghee, at Reply

    2:52 Ana admits men are physically stronger than women….shocking

    • Posted by Michael Maxime, at Reply

      Cockcheese Maghee how is this shocking? she has a whole segment on her
      personal channel with her boyfriend like over a year ago where she talks
      about how men are stronger than women so they shouldnt hit them when they
      get hit by them

    • Posted by WobblyBits_X, at Reply

      Well it *is* scientific fact…

  7. Posted by mike hawk, at Reply

    why hire more males? i though women can do anything men can. in fact ive
    learned that biological sex is just a social construct. sounds like the
    patriarchy is just trying to remove strong independent women from their
    position of power. ana must want women back in the kitchen barefoot and
    pregnant.

    • Posted by Joseph Zinga, at Reply

      Do you really not realize that what you just stated contradicts the current
      feminist talking points?
      Whenever one brings up that there might be biological and/ or psychological
      differences between the sexes, they are then labeled as sexist and “part of
      the patriarchy.”

      Do you see the problem, Nik? *ANY* statement suggesting there is a
      difference is labeled sexist.
      Your 1st statement would be labeled as such in the last paragraph would be
      labelled as such. It may seem that you understand this, but how then would
      any problem get solved then in today’s political discourse?
      EDIT: the point is the average male is stronger than the average female;
      Anna acknowledges this. Conclusion: *ON AVERAGE* time the average male is
      stronger and would be more desirable. *NOT every time* just on average.

    • Posted by WobblyBits_X, at Reply

      It’s scientifically proven that men have greater potential for physical
      feats. Men hold higher records for things like weightlifting and speed than
      women. As Joseph pointed out, this only means than men, on average, are
      stronger physically, not that women can’t be just as capable.

      Feminism (and the general concept of equality) is about judging on merits
      rather than established stereotypes about the sexes and making sure that *both
      sexes* have equal rights whether they utilise them or not.

    • Posted by b belly, at Reply

      +WobblyBits_X so you acknowledge physical differences….do you also
      acknowledge mental differences?

      like perhaps men and women like different things typically and perhaps have
      different aptitudes for different jobs

    • Posted by WobblyBits_X, at Reply

      +b belly Mental differences can largely be put down to conditioning.
      Physical differences are set in DNA.

    • Posted by b belly, at Reply

      +WobblyBits_X i think thats what you want to believe….you have nothing to
      base that on

      for example, women outnumber men 2 to 1 nearly in post secondary education
      and yet are outnumbered 2 to 1 by men in STEM….this is not from a lack of
      opportunity

      im amazed that you think evolution would drive such obvious physical
      differences but zero mental differences….that sounds like wishful
      thinking, and the evidence seems to indicate it is

  8. Posted by CerBoris, at Reply

    Cool. Now to get a weapon on an aircraft just take it of a flight
    attendant.

    • Posted by CerBoris, at Reply

      You would think the same thing with a box cutter. Different story if they
      Tased the pilots though.

    • Posted by Deus Dex, at Reply

      Try hijacking an aircraft with a one-shot non-lethal weapon.

    • Posted by CerBoris, at Reply

      +Deus Dex i assumed it would be impossible to hijack a plane with a box
      cutter. They succeeded 4 times out of 4.

    • Posted by Deus Dex, at Reply

      +CerBoris You mean a lethal weapon that can be used unlimited times with
      multiple hijackers wielding them?
      A plane full of angry people are going to stomp you into paste if you take
      and use that Taser.

  9. Posted by Coma White, at Reply

    give them handcuffs if rope doesn’t work, you dont need to taze people. if
    they have a heart attack @ 30000 ft. then what?

    • Posted by cactusman07pim, at Reply

      Open the door and trow them out.

    • Posted by iced4life3, at Reply

      In the air?

    • Posted by cactusman07pim, at Reply

      +iced4life3
      Yes, in the air.

  10. Posted by Erick Picard, at Reply

    I think it comes down to the airline and their ability to effectively train
    their employees. Many people might take comfort in knowing that their
    flights attendants have full control of any situation.

    • Posted by Erick Picard, at Reply

      I don’t think that an airline would consider this unless they believed it
      would have a positive effect on their bottom line. (i.e. added customers).

    • Posted by Payhole Everdouche, at Reply

      Erick Picard
      My favorite method is Valium laced enemas. Pull the pants and undies down.
      Spread the cheeks and insert in the bung hole. Quick and dirty.

    • Posted by erzan, at Reply

      The police are not even sufficiently trained and make mistakes with a
      Taser. You think civilians are?

  11. Posted by JD Tremblay, at Reply

    How about you train your flight attendants to not give out booze until
    people become belligerent?

    • Posted by Dan F, at Reply

      @ C Wilson Thanks squid. Someone had to give us a ride to our
      destinations. GySgt (USMC Ret)

  12. Posted by bxcinderella, at Reply

    Anna looks really pretty in this video. Sidepart and engagement is really
    working out for her. =)

    • Posted by Eric Akif, at Reply

      She got married.

  13. Posted by 32shumble, at Reply

    How about they just stop serving drinks?

    • Posted by 32shumble, at Reply

      I know! and it’s so unjust that drunk drivers are punished just because
      some kill people in car accidents.

    • Posted by Lester Brunt, at Reply

      +32shumble Difference is a drunk driver might kill you while a drunk
      passenger might annoy you. Not really a fair comparison.

    • Posted by reelreeler, at Reply

      to hell with drunks….if they can’t cope for a few hours on a plane
      without a drink, then they have a drinking problem, and their drunkenness
      shouldn’t be everyone who is unlucky enough to be confined to an airliner
      cabin with their sorry asses.

    • Posted by Alex Lowey, at Reply

      Hey f*** you man you’re not taking my drink

    • Posted by Lester Brunt, at Reply

      +reelreeler So because of a few retards I, someone who barely drinks,
      should not be allowed to have 2 glasses of wine so I can sleep through the
      6 wonderful hours of sitting in a torturously uncomfortable seat breathing
      the farts of 100 or so other people?

  14. Posted by Leif Sikorski, at Reply

    How about just banning alcohol on flights?

    • Posted by JOOGAL1111, at Reply

      Never happen, too much money, 100s of people buying drink adds up.

  15. Posted by ToneyCrimson, at Reply

    Here is a better solution…STOP giving alcohol on planes!

    • Posted by XIPHIASCDXX, at Reply

      Nobody would fly, I would, but lots of people are scared and/or just plain
      alcoholics anyway.

    • Posted by Netscape, at Reply

      ToneyCrimson What evidence do you have that alcohol is responsible for
      this? And why punish innocent people to “stop” a few bad people?

  16. Posted by Dragon1717, at Reply

    Mace or Pepper Spray would be better

    • Posted by Jixxy Trix, at Reply

      Bazookas….

    • Posted by Done Lostme, at Reply

      An aerosol in a confined pressurized cabin……………….um not that
      great of an idea!

    • Posted by TheAurian, at Reply

      Mace on a plane? What? Are you nuts?

    • Posted by Done Lostme, at Reply

      Flashbang on a plane, talk about the new Disney ride that would
      be…………….sign me up…………….lol!

  17. Posted by Steven Bee, at Reply

    They will never do this in the US. The airline would be ripped open from
    stem to stern for suggesting that male flight attendants would be better
    able to physically take down an unruly passenger than a woman.

    • Posted by Izzy F, at Reply

      Korea is more sexist than the US

    • Posted by Steven Bee, at Reply

      +Izzy F
      I don’t know if it’s sexism so much as it’s not having allowed the cult of
      political correctness to over-power their basic reasoning skills yet.