Should Sex With Your Lawyer Be Illegal? | Soshal Network, Social Circle Connection

Should Sex With Your Lawyer Be Illegal?

0
Warning: mysql_query(): Access denied for user 'vu2007'@'localhost' (using password: NO) in /var/www/virtual/cakafeteusa.com/htdocs/wp-content/plugins/jvzoo-ad-manager-v1/jvzoo-ad-manager.php on line 333 Warning: mysql_query(): A link to the server could not be established in /var/www/virtual/cakafeteusa.com/htdocs/wp-content/plugins/jvzoo-ad-manager-v1/jvzoo-ad-manager.php on line 333 Warning: mysql_fetch_array() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /var/www/virtual/cakafeteusa.com/htdocs/wp-content/plugins/jvzoo-ad-manager-v1/jvzoo-ad-manager.php on line 335

Enjoyed the video ladies check these swimsuits out

California is considering a ban on client/lawyer sex. Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian, hosts of The Young Turks, break it down. Tell us what you think in the comment section below.

"The nation's largest state bar association is overhauling ethics rules for attorneys for the first time in 30 years, and some lawyers are unhappy about a proposal that would open them up to discipline for having sex with clients.

California currently bars attorneys from coercing a client into sex or demanding sex in exchange for legal representation.

Supporters of an all-out ban say the relationship between a lawyer and client is inherently unequal, so any sexual relationship is potentially coercive. But some attorneys say it's an unjustified invasion of privacy.

The proposal is part of a long-awaited shake-up of the state bar association's ethics rules for attorneys, which were last fully revised in 1987. Lawyers who violate the regulations are subject to discipline ranging from private censure to loss of their legal license.

A state bar commission has spent months crafting and amending 70 rules under goals set by the California Supreme Court. Other changes under consideration would allow the state bar to discipline attorneys for discrimination and harassment even without a separate finding of wrongdoing. The current rule requires a final determination of wrongful discrimination in a lawsuit or other proceeding before the state bar can take action.

Still another change would bring California in line with other states by subjecting prosecutors to discipline for failing to turn over evidence they know or reasonably should know would help the defense.

"The first and foremost goal is to promote confidence in the legal profession and administration of justice and ensure adequate protection to the public," said Lee Smalley Edmon, a California appellate court judge and head of the commission revising the rules.”*

Read more here:

Hosts: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian
Cast: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian

***

The Largest Online News Show in the World. Hosted by Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian. LIVE STREAMING weekdays 6-8pm ET.

Young Turk (n), 1. Young progressive or insurgent member of an institution, movement, or political party. 2. Young person who rebels against authority or societal expectations. (American Heritage Dictionary)

Download audio and video of the full two hour show on-demand + the members-only post game show by becoming a member at . Your membership supports the day to day operations and is vital for our continued success and growth.

Get The Young Turks Mobile App Today!

Download the iOS version here:

Download the Android version here:

Share Your Comments

75 comments

  1. Posted by RT Myths Debunked, at Reply

    Why? The lawyer is gonna screw you one way or the other.

    • Posted by dontworry boutit, at Reply

      true lol

    • Posted by Shane, at Reply

      If lawyers screw you over why even get a lawyer. Represent yourself.

      Oh.

    • Posted by Zee Risek, at Reply

      +Shane
      Because most people don’t know the law well enough to represent themselves.
      Auto mechanics also screw people over, but most people don’t know enough
      about car engines to fix it themselves.

    • Posted by writerconsidered, at Reply

      “Alt-write” that is the funniest comment I’ve read in a long time.

    • Posted by Zee Risek, at Reply

      +writerconsidered
      Thanks, I think you’re the only one that got the joke. Cheers mate.

  2. Posted by Marky Marc, at Reply

    What if I’m representing myself?

    • Posted by Where R Ewe, at Reply

      +feel the bern So are you still feeling the Bern?

    • Posted by Kurtis C., at Reply

      Ladygothii12 – Imagine if the defendant is being charged with public
      indecency.

      The delicious irony…

    • Posted by Ste H, at Reply

      Marky Marc – that depends on whether you’re using the phrase “representing
      myself” euphemistically.

  3. Posted by Tibo Smolders, at Reply

    What if your lawyer is your spouse?

    • Posted by Daniel Ryan, at Reply

      Falsifying evidence is illegal anyway and in legal cases isn’t the lawyers
      job protecting you above all else anyway?

    • Posted by Joe Scirrotto, at Reply

      Daniel Ryan false evidence is only false if it can be proven false,
      otherwise it can be as valid as any other piece of evidence, also it is not
      to protect at any cost, their job is to see that every FACT of the case
      that can help their client is presented to the jury so they can decide, any
      false evidence not proven invalid can sway their decision from the real
      facts

    • Posted by Daniel Ryan, at Reply

      Joe Scirrotto False evidence is still just as illegal when given for a
      lover as any other client. The lawyer will be charged the same way. Saying
      that a lawyer and client can’t be lovers because the lawyer might break the
      law for them is a serious insult to their professionalism. (I presumed
      that’s what you are saying from contextual cues feel free to correct me if
      I misjudged your point.)

    • Posted by Joe Scirrotto, at Reply

      Daniel Ryan i know false evidence is illegal, however, unless the
      prosecution can prove it as such, it is as legal and factual as any other
      piece of evidence, now do i believe all lawyers would risk breaking the law
      to save a lover? no, but the risk of it happening and the low chance of
      disproving it when it does poses a serious risk that we can’t take.

    • Posted by Daniel Ryan, at Reply

      Lawyers have given false evidence for money too. Should we ban paying
      lawyers, you shouldn’t make something illegal because there’s a chance it
      might encourage someone to do something illegal for love/lust someday.

  4. Posted by Красивая блондинка, at Reply

    Walter Scott was shot in the back by a white terrorist.

    • Posted by Stephan Simes, at Reply

      Where R Ewe Putin is not a globalist. He is fighting against the globalist

    • Posted by The Young Turds, at Reply

      Красивая блондинка True i agree. KKK killed him

    • Posted by V. Stiviano, at Reply

      Michael Slager had sex with the juror who refused to convict him.

    • Posted by pyledog, at Reply

      Красивая блондинка thank you for sharing. in other news……

  5. Posted by 6Diego1Diego9, at Reply

    she’s so hot with her hair down

    • Posted by Vollkorn Vampir, at Reply

      re12evil
      Like I said, she need fidy mo pounds fuh me tuh like ‘er.

    • Posted by Bear Arms, at Reply

      Vollkorn Vampir Did you fill your mouth with dicks mid-sentence?

  6. Posted by Comments by Shaun, at Reply

    I like the outfit of the woman in the thumbnail shaking hands with the
    man…heck I like the other ones too.

    • Posted by Mel Lio, at Reply

      What are you watching? Fox News?

  7. Posted by Jamie Cox, at Reply

    not if it gets you out paying the retaining fee of $1,500-$2,000?!?! 😅😃😂

    • Posted by Jamie Cox, at Reply

      +Where R Ewe hahahaha 😅😅😃

  8. Posted by Nick Balis, at Reply

    Has Cenk ever coerced someone at TYT? Like, “Hey, Jimmy. Do you like
    working here? Well then sleep with me, or you’re out the door.”

    • Posted by Matt, at Reply

      That is a really expensive lawsuit right there. Most owners don’t take that
      kind of risk.

    • Posted by Cesar Geney, at Reply

      Nick Balis you misspelled roger ailes

    • Posted by Nick Balis, at Reply

      +Cesar Geney That’s pretty funny.

    • Posted by Andrew Hawes, at Reply

      Do you think Jimmy spits or swallows? Oh, wait…

    • Posted by Vernon Greene, at Reply

      + Cesar Geney LMAO

  9. Posted by Stan Johnson, at Reply

    Should Sex With Your Lawyer Be Illegal? Only if it’s bad.

    • Posted by Ste H, at Reply

      Stan Johnson – maybe use the gymnastics scoring system to rate it, at least
      then if you score low then you can always try HARDER next time.

  10. Posted by pseudo “dumb guy” intellectual, at Reply

    i pay my lawyer in inches

    • Posted by wiseass 5000, at Reply

      how will you ever pay that off?

    • Posted by solidussnake0079, at Reply

      well just don’t shortchange them

    • Posted by A Yap, at Reply

      pseudo intellectual metric system

    • Posted by Taunted By No One Ended Up A Shogun, at Reply

      +Tron Michaels W

    • Posted by Taunted By No One Ended Up A Shogun, at Reply

      +solidussnake0079 W

  11. Posted by jose arguijo, at Reply

    sex fucks everything up

    • Posted by Khaotic Twist, at Reply

      That’s kinda the point.

    • Posted by Ste H, at Reply

      Khaotic Twist – very witty. 👏🏻

  12. Posted by Urius Tosh, at Reply

    My lawyer works pro-boner.

    • Posted by Ste H, at Reply

      Urius Tosh – now that was funny. 👏🏻

    • Posted by Space Monkey, at Reply

      lool, made my day

  13. Posted by Celso Junior, at Reply

    Ok, but can I at least bang the judge?

    • Posted by CandC68, at Reply

      Sorry. Judges are the ones with the gavel. They do the banging.

    • Posted by A Yap, at Reply

      Celso Junior naked under the robe

  14. Posted by bumtree, at Reply

    Sex with your lawyer should not only be legal but mandatory.

    • Posted by Buddy Love, at Reply

      bumtree Even with a man

    • Posted by Gold Man, at Reply

      Barron trump is the chikd of ivanka and donald. Prove otherwise!

    • Posted by Your Lawyer, at Reply

      bumtree Exactly

  15. Posted by Nicholas Lehner, at Reply

    The question in my mind is legal DURING a trail or after one?

    • Posted by God satan, at Reply

      after one

  16. Posted by magister343, at Reply

    One of my cousins is sleeping with her divorce attorney.

    • Posted by Comment Machine (Harambabe), at Reply

      I am interested in the way you found it out.

    • Posted by dung tran, at Reply

      Comment Machine probably told him/her/etc. My cousin is a blabbermouth and
      tells everybody about all of her sexual partners. She’s sort of the black
      sheep in the family.

    • Posted by fkujakedmyname, at Reply

      thats why it should be illegal and she should be in jail and loose
      everything to her ex

  17. Posted by Leedark3, at Reply

    So, if you represent yourself, no masturbation?

    • Posted by Gloraidy Rivera, at Reply

      Leedark3 masturbation isn’t having sex, if it is then we are all not
      virgins (babies masturbate).

    • Posted by Leedark3, at Reply

      +Gloraidy Rivera Here’s the joke -> JOKE.

      And here’s your head—> YOUR HEAD

      Can you tell me where the joke is in relation to your head?

    • Posted by Gloraidy Rivera, at Reply

      +Leedark3 making jokes on a subject when there’s literally millions of
      people out there who genuinely are ignorant over the subject makes for a
      very poor joke and poor judgement. It’s only natural to assume people are
      being ignorant over the Internet than just think a person is making a “it’s
      a joke, I’m only pretending to be stupid because I already knew better. See
      haha it’s so funny because you thought I was stupid” type of joke.

    • Posted by Gloraidy Rivera, at Reply

      +Leedark3​ ok since you insist it was a joke explain exactly how it was a
      “joke”. Just in case you don’t know what a joke is (because you seem to
      think that I’m angry? I’m not, I’m just stating a truth) , they are
      supposed to be funny to a group of people. Since there’s millions of people
      who are undereductated about sex education and masturbation, I’d like to
      know how exactly is the “joke” not made in poor taste? It would be as if
      you made a “joke” about lynching black people by pretending to be an
      alt-right member making racist comments and then saying “it’s just a joke”.
      Seriously, as someone who has lived in several third world places at least
      I take the time to spread knowledge (in those places people will use
      anything such as cut up potatoes to suck out the sperm and think it’s
      safe). You just sit behind a computer screen feeling butthurt because
      someone told you the truth: that your thought process was ignorant and
      therefore needed correcting to prevent the spread of ignorance and that if
      it was done as a “joke” that it was made in very poor taste.

  18. Posted by Chris Pierce, at Reply

    The ad for this video for me was for a law firm haha

    • Posted by idontloveducks, at Reply

      Not a coincidence

  19. Posted by Deaglan Cullen, at Reply

    Usual rules. If everyone’s freely consenting, have at it.

    • Posted by r pray, at Reply

      Exactly! If the client isn’t underage, the adults are mentally competent
      and they consented have at it! But, I do see what the people are saying
      with the imbalance of power.

    • Posted by Deaglan Cullen, at Reply

      +r pray Yes, but the imbalance of power invalidates free consent

    • Posted by Big Bub, at Reply

      Deaglan Cullen
      actually it doesn’t. at least not generally, but in certain circumstances
      it can.
      But there are some that want this “imbalance of power” narrative to become
      something that invalidates consent.

    • Posted by Big Bub, at Reply

      r pray
      yes but that’s life. yiu can always find some kind of “imbalance of power”
      in almost any relationship. so that shouldn’t be enough to make the
      relationship illegal.

      *ik you didn’t say it should be, I’m just stating a point.

  20. Posted by SweatyShivers, at Reply

    I’ve been fucked by lawyers a few times, it’s only fair that I should be
    able to return the favor.

    • Posted by Lord Caelvanir, at Reply

      SweatyShivers *Slow clap*