Trump Doubts Roy Moore Accusers | Soshal Network, Social Circle Connection

Trump Doubts Roy Moore Accusers

0

Enjoyed the video ladies check these swimsuits out

Behind the curtain Trump claims he doubts the women accusing Moore. Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian, the hosts of The Young Turks, discuss. Tell us just what you assume in the comment area below.

" President Donald Trump's near-endorsement of Alabama Republican Roy Moore followed days of behind-the-scenes talks in which he vented about Moore's accusers and shared skepticism regarding their accounts.

Throughout animated discussions with elderly Republicans and White House aides, the head of state claimed he questioned the tales presented by Moore's accusers and also questioned why they were arising currently, simply weeks prior to the election, according to two White Home advisers and 2 other people knowledgeable about the talks.

The White Residence advisers stated the president attracted parallels in between Moore's situation and also the one he faced just over a year ago when, during the last weeks of the 2016 campaign, Trump faced a lengthy line of women who charged him of harassment. He adamantly refuted the cases.

The head of state's personal beliefs burglarized the open Tuesday when Trump just about declared he thought Moore's rejections.

" Allow me just tell you, Roy Moore refutes it. That's all I can claim. He denies it. And, incidentally, he absolutely refutes it," Trump informed press reporters. Moore, 70, that has actually been accused of sexually going after– as well as sometimes attacking– teenagers or young women when he remained in his 30s."

Find out more below:

Hosts: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian

Cast: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian

***

The Largest Online News Program in the Globe. Held by Cenk Uygur as well as Ana Kasparian. LIVE STREAMING weekdays 6-8pm ET.

Sign up for The Young Turks on YouTube:

Like The Young Turks on Facebook:

Comply With The Young Turks on Twitter:

Acquire TYT Merch:

Download and install audio and video of the complete two hour show on-demand + the members-only message game show by becoming a participant at. Your membership sustains the day to day procedures and also is vital for our continued success and also development.

Young Turk (n), 1. Young modern or anarchical member of an establishment, movement, or political event. 2. A young adult that rebels against authority or social expectations.( American Heritage Thesaurus).

Share Your Comments

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

53 comments

  1. Posted by The Persian Atheist, at Reply

    Correction *TYT Doubts Jordan Chariton Accusers*

    • Posted by Hal Jordan, at Reply

      The Persian Atheist
      You accused TYT of siding against Jordan’s accuser, when in reality, they fired him. You accused TYT of not addressing the situation, when in reality, they have addressed it. Going into detail will just help Jordan, and hurt TYT and Jordan’s victim, which is why TYT isn’t going into depth about the legal situation here. Cenk’s lawyer advised him to keep things quiet. I’ve explained this to you before. You’re being purposely obtuse.

    • Posted by The Persian Atheist, at Reply

      Hal Jordan I didn’t “accuse” Jordan or tyt of anything. I simply asked for consistency because they pretend the main stream media lies unlike them who keep it “real”.

      You guys LOVE stories only when the alleged predator happens to be a conservative. Also the legality is never questioned by tyt or fangirls like you.

      Just admit it, you’re just a fangirl with zero consistency and you have no principles.

    • Posted by Hal Jordan, at Reply

      The Persian Atheist
      You tried to make accusations, then fell flat on your face. Unlike you, I have called out predators on both sides, and I applauded TYT for doing the same. TYT just posted a public video about Jordan, further showing you to be a partisan hack. Seriously, I don’t even know why you bother doing what you do.

    • Posted by BadBadManners, at Reply

      Ah, famed russian troll whos main quest is to sow conflict. No content just a bunch’a trigger word-nonsense.

  2. Posted by Steve Hirsch, at Reply

    “Soft on crime?” Endorsement of a child rapist is as “soft on crime” as it gets…

    • Posted by Bill Moody, at Reply

      Soft on Crime… like prosecuting those “fine people” in the white bed sheets… and winning.

  3. Posted by DefeatGlobalism, at Reply

    TYT doesn’t believe in the basic idea of innocent until proven guilty. Show me the pictures of Moore groping women like Democratic senator Al Franken.

    • Posted by Bill Moody, at Reply

      Except Franken admitted he screwed up, and suggested that he BE investigated.

    • Posted by DefeatGlobalism, at Reply

      Hal Jordan the first three were also allegation levied against him by political opponents. His campaign disputes them. Stalking your crush is something every guy does, it’s hardly a sign of guilt.

    • Posted by Hal Jordan, at Reply

      She was a 15-year-old girl, and he was a grown man, you filthy child molester protector. That’s not normal behavior.

    • Posted by Rethinking Religions, at Reply

      So Hillary is innocent until proven guilty? Where were you when the foaming at the mouth crowd at the Republican National Convention were shouting “lock her up”? Hypocrite!

  4. Posted by Kevin Montrond, at Reply

    Why wouldn’t he? Child molesters got to stick together.

    • Posted by J N, at Reply

      Kevin Montrond Troll alert. Looking for quick thumbs up and friends.

    • Posted by blistified, at Reply

      when are high school girls considered children, i guess that pimp from dazed and confused was a pedo cause he liked high school girls hahahahahaahha

  5. Posted by John Carpenter, at Reply

    And yet you just had a show where you and Cenk said you shouldn’t investigate old crimes, like Uranium One.

    • Posted by BuyLow SellHigh, at Reply

      Uranium One is not a scandal you moron.

      Yes, the Russians purchased Uranium One, a publicly traded, Canadian listed uranium mining company with assets in Kazakhstan, the United States and Tanzania.
      – However, First, Uranium One’s assets that were located in the US (and account for less than 2% of global supply) do not export to Russia (the US is an imported of uranium). What Russia really wanted in the acquisition was UO’s Kazakhstan assets, the country that produces ~40% of global uranium supply.
      – Second, the State Department was one of *nine* government agencies, not to mention independent federal and state nuclear regulators, that had to sign off on the deal (ie, the State Department played a very small role in the transaction).
      – Third, while nine people related to the company actually donated to the Clinton Foundation at some point in time, none of them were involved with the company by the time of the Russian deal and therefore got nothing from it.
      – Fourth, most of their Clinton Foundation donations occurred before and during Hillary Clinton’s 2008 presidential bid, before anyone could have known she would become secretary of state.

    • Posted by Listenbuddy1, at Reply

      Ex Animus No, you do. 😜

    • Posted by John Carpenter, at Reply

      BLSH, here is what I find amusing. I called out Cenk for being inconsistent and not one of the comments that responded to me, responded to my point that I made to Cenk. Not one. Is there nobody who supports them that is capable of dealing with a comment directly? I will write my question in finger-paints if need be. Was Cenk being inconsistent in saying that we shouldn’t investigate crimes older than two years unless it is a non crime that happened 40 years ago by a Republican. I say investigate all criminal wrongdoing by politicians. All of it, left right, middle. I don’t care, I don’t trust any of them. Did you not read this thread? Why are you people so afraid of Uranium One, as Shakespeare said, “I think the lady protests too much”. I don’t care about Trump or Hillary.

    • Posted by Chairun Siregar, at Reply

      What are you talking about? I directly talked about it. I said to my knowledge he didn’t say you shouldn’t investigate it, he said it’s not urgent. Like if I tell you you should definitely file your taxes, but not while your house is on of fire.

  6. Posted by NyeusiMuslim, at Reply

    Innocent until proven guilty.

    • Posted by Nathan Baker, at Reply

      There won’t be any criminal trial, because it’s past the statute of limitations. The voters of Alabama will have to decide whether Moore is innocent or guilty.

  7. Posted by jarjon76, at Reply

    Trump has publicly defended Nazis, other white supremacists, and pedophiles. Enough said.

    • Posted by joeisgod18, at Reply

      jarjon76 but everyone is a nazi now-a-days soooo it means nothing

  8. Posted by Vile Crocodile, at Reply

    40 year old allegations right before an important election

    Lololololololololol

    • Posted by Extreme RWDS, at Reply

      Libtards are desperate

  9. Posted by myname is love, at Reply

    TYT .. Still drowning in liberal tears 😂
    Why didn’t you defend Jordan?

    • Posted by The Iranian Liberal, at Reply

      Cause they’re CUCKS!

    • Posted by James Eslick, at Reply

      Cenk will only defend his Armenian genocide trophy collection.

    • Posted by myname is love, at Reply

      Luka Akul rotflmao!!
      Go drink more of your yeast cake cuk!

  10. Posted by thesecretgarden, at Reply

    has tyt never heard of innocent until proven guilty?

    • Posted by Marvin the Martian, at Reply

      If it looks and quacks like a duck…

    • Posted by Joshua Mireles, at Reply

      He was banned from a mall cause he was being a creep….. that is enough for me not to take a risk, And hire some one. even for fast food server I would not hire him.

    • Posted by multitudeofidols, at Reply

      It’s not about the law right now. It’s about the people of Alabama taking the chance that all these allegations against him, on top of his banishment from a mall and YMCA on corroborated claims, are worth electing him to Senate. Because this is about an election and about whether people are willing to choose a potential predator simply because of his political party.

  11. Posted by Never go full retard, at Reply

    Well it’s official. Trump loves rapist, molesters, Nazi’s and pardons criminald. Oh, Bill and Hillary you say? Corrupt and another rapist? Well he had no problem inviting them to his wedding did he?

  12. Posted by The Diesel, at Reply

    What a sad day in age we are in. Not to mention Roy Moore’s wife is even lower than him by defending him. She chose money over morals.

    • Posted by Timefliesbye, at Reply

      The Diesel sounds allot like this other woman who did everything she could to defend her politician husband… only in this case the rape victim didn’t wait 30 yeara… this victim has been saying it since 1978… but hey when it’s the wrong side of the political spectrum….

    • Posted by Desiree Reifgraber, at Reply

      The Diesel he is e pedo and she is worser … american pff

    • Posted by MRostendway, at Reply

      Timefliesbye Clinton is actually worse becausr clinton also used the media and investigators to shame and silence the accusers.
      That said both are pretty disgusting.

    • Posted by peter, at Reply

      @Timefliesbye, liberals ignore sexual abuse when it is on the left? *Are you trolling?*

      Look at how the recent hollywood abusers were swiftly condemned. Al Franken, who was accused of 1/100th as much as Roy Moore, has probably been talked about as much as Roy Moore, and has at least offered an apology.

      Yeah, Bill Clinton may well be another abuser. Yeah, he no doubt has an army of lawyers. The idea that liberals are unwilling to prosecute him because he is left totally ignores the evidence of all the progressives who do not even like him, and objective reality. Go get him if you have the evidence. It is certainly only money, not the left, that is protecting him.

  13. Posted by Coos Oorlog, at Reply

    “I have looked at his record”
    I don’t believe Trump has ever looked at a record of anything. He’s barely able to read.

    • Posted by Memorandom, at Reply

      The only records Trump has ever looked at are the vinyl kind.

    • Posted by Akmal Ibrahim, at Reply

      The reporters should’ve pressed him on it. Ask him what specific record was bad.

  14. Posted by Aaron N, at Reply

    If hell was real then God’s going to have an easy time when looking at the Alabama voter rolls.

  15. Posted by tetsubo57, at Reply

    Anyone that votes for Moore is morally bankrupt.

    • Posted by Ragitsu, at Reply

      No problem. They can always file for Chapter 11.

  16. Posted by sharoncatwoman, at Reply

    GOP = Grand Old Pedophiles

    • Posted by Electrodude, at Reply

      Gang Of Pedophiles

  17. Posted by Heat And Serve, at Reply

    The sad thing is that Roy Moore is spectacularly unqualified otherwise. He has been elected twice and removed twice from the Alabama Supreme Court for failing to uphold the United States Constitution. He also had trouble with the IRS when it was uncovered that he hade taken $1 million in salary from his foundation. Which is more than the foundation had actually disclosed in revenue in it’s tax forms.

    It seems that his campaign is pretty much running on the slogan: “At least he’s (hopefully) not a pedo”.

    • Posted by Jorge Amado Soria Ramírez, at Reply

      In reality, it´s more like “Hey, at least he is not a Democrat”. Because apparently that´s worse than being a theocratic nutjob pedophile, at least according to Conway and Trump.

    • Posted by Heat And Serve, at Reply

      Jorge Amado Soria Ramírez It’s ironic that the party who promotes personal responsibility use that argument. Sarah Huckabee Sanders said the difference between Roy Moore and Al Franken was that Franken admitted wrong-doing. He wrote a public apology and declared his utmost regret, i.e. took personal responsibility. As Trump put it Roy Moore “totally denies it”. Meaning he takes no responsibility what so ever.

  18. Posted by alt-right Smasher, at Reply

    The more disgusting the person, the more magatards like them.
    It’s like conservatives don’t have principles, or morality.
    I don’t know…

    • Posted by Greg K, at Reply

      alt-right Smasher conservatives have been immoral for a while now