Why Arpaio’s Pardon Could Trigger Constitutional Crisis | Soshal Network, Social Circle Connection

Why Arpaio’s Pardon Could Trigger Constitutional Crisis

0

Enjoyed the video ladies check these swimsuits out

Trump has pardoned Joe Arpaio. Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian, the hosts of The Young Turks, simplify. Tell us exactly what you assume in the comment section listed below. Indicator request below:

" Washington (CNN) Head of state Donald Trump defended his choice to pardon former Arizona Constable Joe Arpaio as Storm Harvey hammered the Texas shore, insisting during a news conference on Monday the timing was planned to draw interest.

" I thought the scores would certainly be much above they would be generally," he claimed of his decision to go forward with the statement as the country's focus was diverted to the enormous tornado.

The pardon has drawn objection from civil rights groups or even some Republicans, who have regreted the relocation saving the debatable Arizona lawman from a prison term.
But Trump was unrepentant Monday, urging Arpaio's hardline strategies were justified.

" He's done a terrific job for the people of Arizona. He's extremely solid on boundaries, really solid on unlawful immigration," Trump claimed at a mid-day news conference with his Finnish equivalent. "He is loved in Arizona. I believed he was dealt with unbelievably unjustly."
Arpaio was founded guilty of criminal contempt last month for ignoring a court order in a racial profiling situation. He's been charged for several years of breaking fundamental civils rights in his prisons, yet Trump demanded Monday he was no even worse compared to Americans who had actually been provided clemency by previous presidents."

Find out more right here:

Hosts: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian

Cast: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian

***

The Largest Online Information Show in the World. Organized by Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian. LIVE STREAMING weekdays 6-8pm ET.

Subscribe to The Young Turks on YouTube:

Like The Young Turks on Facebook:
Adhere to The Young Turks on Twitter:

Acquire TYT Merch:

Download and install sound and also video of the full 2 hr program on-demand + the members-only article game show by ending up being a member at. Your membership sustains the everyday procedures and is essential for our ongoing success and development.

Young Turk (n), 1. Young dynamic or insurgent participant of an institution, motion, or political celebration. 2. A young adult that rebels against authority or social expectations.( American Heritage Thesaurus).

Share Your Comments

60 comments

  1. Posted by juan gomez, at Reply

    Just in case, Arpaio is pardoned that doesn’t mean he’s not a criminal.

    • Posted by Banana Republic USA, at Reply

      Halman: No, it’s not a political case. It’s about violating the Constitutional Rights of US citizens. It’s about ignoring a (Republican) Judge’s direct order regarding stopping that practice. It’s about committing a crime.

      Nothing to do with politics.

    • Posted by Mega MAGA DON, at Reply

      Like Hillary right?
      Also Obama?

    • Posted by Remy van Tol, at Reply

      Age doesn’t matter when crimes are committed and no remorse is shown.

    • Posted by Halman2112, at Reply

      Bill Anderson Very un-American of me, I’m a Canadian..🇨🇦

  2. Posted by rouge1ful, at Reply

    trump pardoning a criminal held in criminal contempt of the courts, well this may be the quickest way to impeach him, because you cant do that, a federal court found him guilty you cant just pardon him. but i bet he’ll be the new chief strategist in a week or 2

    • Posted by Karen Skinner, at Reply

      Not in the way he did it.

    • Posted by Done Lostme, at Reply

      No it does not, the conviction was for Criminal Contempt of Court so the crime was ignoring the Order of the Court, not grand civil rights issue you wish it to be. If it were as you claim the Judicial Activist Judge and her ilk would have brought Federal Civil Rights violations charges which carry much stiffer penalty but would have put the original ruling to the test outside her jurisdiction as it probably would have gone to the Supreme Court and then we are probably looking a Jury Trial as well!

    • Posted by rouge1ful, at Reply

      once again doing this trump ignores the constitutional rule of law. the law that is a federal court found Arpaio guilty of criminal contempt, and trump pardoned him regardless of that and even though he said he be the “law and order president” multiple times he ignores the constitutional rule of law and trump pardoned him anyway. trump is suppose to uphold the constitution and he broke it. he’s broken it before and continues to break it with the Emoluments Clause but this is arguably worse. he broke the constitution it is an impeachable offence.

    • Posted by Done Lostme, at Reply

      So we are moving the bar now? What Trump did was framed right in the Constitution even the NY Times admitted that, and now you are running out charges based on the Emoluments Clause which the Washington Post called unproven and speak as if they are Fact. So please provide some evidence for the charges you bring, have you heard of the burden of proof? What in the constitution did he ignore?

    • Posted by rouge1ful, at Reply

      i literally listed all of the reasons why its an impeachable offense.

  3. Posted by Kevin Montrond, at Reply

    Locks up all lantios thinking they are illegals without any evidence.
    -> Gets convicted of a federal crime and gets his racsim exposed.

    This is trumps kind of guy. They are friends now.

    • Posted by Kyle G, at Reply

      +9753flyer I don’t consider anchor babies citizens. I guarantee you almost 100% of Mexicans living in Arizona/Texas/Cali etc are illegals or children/grandchildren of illegals. The 14th Amendment was designed for ex-slaves, not the third world to come here and drop anchors for the Democrats to have a permanent voting block going into the future.

    • Posted by Trey Corteź, at Reply

      Kevin Montrond the courts tried to screw him over! I love Sheriff Joe and he was treated badly by the obama justice department and obama holdovers!

    • Posted by Trey Corteź, at Reply

      Kyle G THANK YOU!!! OH MY BROTHER PREACH!!! 🙌

    • Posted by Trey Corteź, at Reply

      Illegals have NO RIGHTS! ONLY HUMAN RIGHTS AND THATS ALL!!! WE LOVE LEGAL U.S. CITIZENS! NOT ANCHOR BABIES OR ILLEGALS!!!

  4. Posted by ting280, at Reply

    Pretty soon the UN’s going to start issuing sanctions against the US for all of Trump’s human rights violations

    • Posted by R. McBride, at Reply

      @elos20 No, it’s not. I think you are confused. See John Crockett’s comment.

    • Posted by LightBearer, at Reply

      UN issued an early warning that US is headed toward a civil war.
      finland’s largest pension fund dumped its us stock holdings, bc US doesn’t have a president right now, and running on Auto-Pilot.
      America is crumbling without sanctions

  5. Posted by DankNSpank, at Reply

    Trumptards giving their king a pass for disregarding the law and constitution “because librulz”.

    • Posted by randomguy5990, at Reply

      manhunt48 I didn’t say that was illegal, it just proves that “Law and order” doesn’t really matter to Republicans. You are a trump supporter, I can tell because you consider criticism of Trump to be “blind hatred”. You people always find a way to make Trump the victim.

  6. Posted by kirkgrniis, at Reply

    King Trump King Trump King Trump! I expect to hear that at all his rallies now so get on that gullible Trump loving morons.

    • Posted by VaultDweller068, at Reply

      Brick Schitthouse ya right. Maybe a year if your lucky.

    • Posted by Steven perdue, at Reply

      Brick Schitthouse I’m doubting he makes it til Xmas. So that should get all you right wing nuts in a hissy cuck fit. get used to it hombre : )

    • Posted by Brick Schitthouse, at Reply

      Why will he be removed? What has he done?

  7. Posted by Modesty Blaise, at Reply

    Wow! And I thought we had a crap government here in the UK but yours is so much worse. Scary.

    • Posted by Ger Vas, at Reply

      Not true 30,000 people are murdered every year with a gun

    • Posted by Modesty Blaise, at Reply

      saveusmilkboy Don’t get me wrong, nobody is perfect and no country is perfect. It saddens me that greed and power are the driving force for so many people.

    • Posted by saveusmilkboy, at Reply

      Modesty Blaise
      My father thinks the worst thing about politics are politicians. Thus, he figures, if you want to be a politician, this should automatically disqualify you from doing the job…

    • Posted by Modesty Blaise, at Reply

      saveusmilkboy I agree. To quote the amazing Billy Connolly. “The desire to be a politician should bar you for life from ever being one.”

  8. Posted by Paul Mannix, at Reply

    Impeach

    • Posted by Carl Woodard, at Reply

      Paul Mannix *NOW*

  9. Posted by Randy H, at Reply

    The wall to keep out Mexicans, the Muslim ban, the transgender ban, suppressing black voters, and pardoning a controversial racist cop. This is not the America that I was raised to believe in. Regardless of your political views, there comes a time when you must ask yourselves, “Where do I draw the line?”

  10. Posted by Ken Chang, at Reply

    First they will come for Mexican, then they will come for Muslim, than they come for transgender.
    I wonder who the American President is coming back next….
    I guess the only one that is safe is Russians.

    • Posted by jacob earwood, at Reply

      Ken Chang you have autism

    • Posted by advocatus diaboli, at Reply

      Ken Chang they went after illegal immigrants you racist asshat. Not all Mexicans are illegals

    • Posted by damian guilfoyle, at Reply

      jacob earwood
      is that the best you’ve got?

    • Posted by necroryda, at Reply

      Arpaio didn’t just go after illegals which is why he was convicted but your racist President supports him and called him a patriot

  11. Posted by Sam Sawlani, at Reply

    In the UK The head of State is not above the rule of law and cannot pardon her or himself or people who ignore or does not respect the order of the law made by parliament. We sorted it out in 1215.
    America, do you want to come back to the United Kingdom?

    • Posted by dee MAVERICK, at Reply

      Sam Sawlani No!

  12. Posted by Erin Okay, at Reply

    next term we must make amendments to the constitution that disallow this kind of tyranny.

    • Posted by Stu Bur, at Reply

      It is already disallowed within the main body of the Constitution. Presidents can not pardon federal contempt of court.

  13. Posted by Mark P, at Reply

    I thought republicans were all about personal responsibility. Wouldn’t pardoning a guilty man go against that?

    • Posted by Sheree CuteNLoc'd, at Reply

      Mark P but he’s not a true republican, he was a democrat for so long

  14. Posted by Stu Bur, at Reply

    According to Constitutional law, Presidential pardons are not supposed to be applicable to contempt of court cases. They can apply to just about every other federal crime but not contempt because that is a matter entirely in the hands of the courts. This was written in as an intentional check on Presidential power so that Congress can investigate the executive branch with the power to compel testimony.

    • Posted by Johnf275, at Reply

      The pardon power extends only to federal crimes. Otherwise, presidents are free to use it as they see fit. As the Supreme Court put it in an 1866 decision involving a former Confederate senator, Ex Parte Garland, the power “is unlimited.”

      “It extends,” the court said, “to every offense known to the law.”

  15. Posted by womble321, at Reply

    You know I thought Brexit was a mess but at least our lot obay the law.

    • Posted by U. Jekyll, at Reply

      PS..I am descended from slaves. Im very familiar with the history.

    • Posted by dstacie, at Reply

      But the effects of colonialism and slavery still exist, so please, stop.

    • Posted by U. Jekyll, at Reply

      Stop what?

    • Posted by honeychurchgipsy6, at Reply

      U. Jekyll – you just won today’s top prize for ‘what aboutery’ by bringing up totally unrelated historical issues. There is a difference between how human rights were envisaged two hundred years ago, and how they are seen now. Even in the last few years the western world has moved on with, for example, gay rights. Please find me a government which has significantly better human rights (and these must include all humans not just white men) than the British Empire – you might surprise me of course, but I doubt you’ll find much difference.

  16. Posted by Rasmus Nielsen, at Reply

    Trump is not in favor of law and order, he’s only in favor of order, while completely ignoring the law part, classic authoritarian.

    • Posted by Karina Kuo, at Reply

      Rasmus Nielsen – Specifically his orders.

  17. Posted by Joe X, at Reply

    I disagree. Impeach Trump now, not later.

    • Posted by Herve B, at Reply

      That’s risky and could empower him if it fails.

    • Posted by James Conn, at Reply

      Joe X
      I predict that President Trump will be impeached in 2025

  18. Posted by Elfin4, at Reply

    Arpaio was getting away with having a concentration camp. Modern day racist and Nazis, probably why Trump likes him.

    • Posted by TheJabberwocky28, at Reply

      A concentration camp? Got anything to back this up?

    • Posted by Elfin4, at Reply

      The Jabber….
      Yeah it was on a News broadcast on line showing Senator McCaine talking about his wife who had visited the camp set up for holding those who were arrested following Arpaio’s arrests of those who were racially profiled and picked up. Arpaio had apparently tried to stop her visiting and filming the camp and intervened in her meeting. Search for the interview on line…

    • Posted by Foniks Monkee, at Reply

      TheJabberwocky28 he joked about it himself. You can find it online.