Would You Bomb Civilians To Kill Terrorists? | Soshal Network, Social Circle Connection

Would You Bomb Civilians To Kill Terrorists?


Enjoyed the video ladies check these swimsuits out

We tell you the results of some recent surveys we have actually done. Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian, the hosts of The Young Turks, inform you how you elected. Tell us exactly what you think in the remark area listed below.

Hosts: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian

Cast: Cenk Uygur, Ana Kasparian


The Largest Online News Program in the Globe. Held by Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian. LIVE STREAMING weekdays 6-8pm ET.

Young Turk (n), 1. Young dynamic or insurgent participant of an organization, motion, or political party. 2. A young adult that rebels versus authority or societal assumptions.( American Heritage Thesaurus).

Download and install sound and also video clip of the complete two hr show on-demand + the members-only article game show by becoming a participant at. Your subscription sustains the day to day procedures and is crucial for our ongoing success as well as development.

Get The Young Turks Mobile Application Today!

Download and install the iOS variation below:.

Download and install the Android variation right here:.

Share Your Comments


  1. Posted by Kaiza, at Reply

    The US killing civilians? NO WAY, really?

    Because when have they ever done that?

    • Posted by MsArilyn, at Reply

      Yeah, lol just ask doctors without borders.

    • Posted by MsArilyn, at Reply

      Indeed, Accelerating Friction which I find odd. Especially when the fact of the matter is Hillary would have been better than Trump but you voted for Trump anyway, which just seems stupid.

  2. Posted by Bravo Son I'm Proud, at Reply

    Yes I would bomb civilians in order to kill terrorist… sacrifices always have to be made.

    • Posted by LICKMYNYNE, at Reply

      necroryda what? 😒 I’m talking about combat zones with enemies and civilians in the same area… I’m taking about two opposing forces in a combat zone.. and you knew that so why even try..😑

    • Posted by necroryda, at Reply

      LICKMYNYNE in their view america is a combat zone. the type of combat is.dictated by their.military capacity. just because theu are incapabale of waging a war in the same capacity as you does not delegitimise their methods, in fact your countries history of drone strikes and your current presidents endorsement of terrorism in regards to targetting non combatants like family members have added even more legitimacy to.their methods of war.

    • Posted by choudhry ali, at Reply

      Bravo Son I’m Proud And then those terrorists go and tell the families of the dead civilians “I told you so”…more terrorists are then made.

    • Posted by The Least Racist Most Intelligent and Sexy Philantropist by the Grace of God, at Reply

      Bravo Son I’m Proud Would you kill your mother for your country?

  3. Posted by Thelogicalape, at Reply

    Cenk would kill Armenian civilians

    • Posted by ODIEkriss, at Reply

      Melanoma Trump is this account strictly dedicated to trolling Trump supporters and Trolls?

    • Posted by The Worm, at Reply

      Make sure to see the PROMISE on the 21st so you can see for youself that the Armenian Genocide happened, and that it was done by the people the Young Turks are named after.

    • Posted by Joe Gallop, at Reply

      @the worm..NO THANKS if i want fake news ill just watch fox. turkey is crawling with armenian muslims and christians… if turks wanted to “wipe out armenians from the face of the earth” as the movie claims …they would have come pretty close …turks freed those idiot from slavery to the armenians living near india…they enslaved their own for the persian empire SMH turks are heroes

    • Posted by Vanessthebest, at Reply

      Hysterical that some old Trump trash are coming back back with this troll meme, despite them not
      being able to find that country on a map.

  4. Posted by I support the gay agenda, at Reply

    Yes lets commit terroristic acts to prevent terrorists from committing terroristic acts.

    • Posted by Lebanese Edgyist, at Reply

      I’m 100% against American foreign policy, but this is such a dumb argument to make. According to this logic you could never do anything in a war the moment that your enemy retreats or places ressources in populated areas. There’s a reason why rules of engagement are what they are and allow for civilian collateral damage, a lot of thought throughout the centuries has gone into it

    • Posted by Eric Driggers, at Reply

      +Extreme Donald Trump

      Why is their life less than yours? Legitimately.

    • Posted by Eric Driggers, at Reply

      +Lebanese Edgyist

      I understand what you’re saying, but this actually isn’t entirely true. What it DOES say is that perhaps 50% chance is not worth the sacrifice. What percentage would rationalize such an archaic act however is beyond me.

  5. Posted by The Moral Crusader, at Reply

    Would liberals let in millions of Muslim refugees if they were all flooded into their neighborhoods?

    • Posted by Jen Zim, at Reply


    • Posted by carl1223, at Reply

      Eazy They would say no; obviously. That doesnt mean we should suicide our culture because we “deserve it”, though.

    • Posted by Diva Artist, at Reply

      Trump voters should just fxxking admit they were surprised when Trump actually admitted during prez debate – that Obama had existing deportation and strict border policies. Trumpanzees hyper-inflate every single fxxking little threats to justify barbaric aggression. Now thousands of families are split across oceans, innocent kids get locked up at airports. Just to pacify some assholes who can’t tell Iran from Iraq but would hang Hillary for eating Syrian babies!! SHAME!

  6. Posted by Darcseid27, at Reply

    Trump watches Daddy Daughter porn

    • Posted by Darcseid27, at Reply

      Dragon1717 I heard it on Fox News

    • Posted by Vanessthebest, at Reply

      There has been no questiom anywhere for years *

    • Posted by The Least Racist Most Intelligent and Sexy Philantropist by the Grace of God, at Reply

      Darcseid27 FACT.

  7. Posted by Liberals thats that shit i dont like bang bang, at Reply

    The Young Turks will be glad to do that to Armenians

    • Posted by Puddin, at Reply

      +Bennie Gray Are you aware that the natives were just as greedy and violent as the Europeans?

    • Posted by Vanessthebest, at Reply

      New troll this is a progressive network, not Democrat (Huffing leaded paint from taps in the trailer

    • Posted by Vanessthebest, at Reply

      Your mom denies your existence, attention seeking troll as per usual.

  8. Posted by Flay Liberals, at Reply

    Genk wants Sharia Law

    • Posted by Good Guy, at Reply

      Super Smoke how so ?

  9. Posted by America's Imperialist, at Reply

    TYT forgot to mention one crucial thing, OBAMA and his ADMINISTRATION has killed more civilians than Dubya Bush. Liberal scum.

    • Posted by Jordan Ortiz, at Reply

      Iamlettuce This comment is the only comment with reason I’ve seen on any TYT video in months. They’re all scum and I’m so glad I’m not the only who sees it. I thought I was going crazy.

    • Posted by Jordan Ortiz, at Reply

      Iamlettuce Not imperialist’s comment. I meant your comment.

  10. Posted by Luis Franco, at Reply

    Fight terrorism with more terrorism? Anyone that supports this is a disgusting human being.

    • Posted by Extreme Donald Trump, at Reply

      “Fight wars with more wars? Anyone that supporters this is a disgusting human being” Weak and disgraceful coward.

    • Posted by Hakuraita, at Reply

      Not if you terrorize them enough? Or destroy them so thoroughly that for the next thousand years, not even a single lizard could survive in their deserts.

    • Posted by Charlie Cain, at Reply

      that’s not the correct analogy “Extreme Donald Drumpf”

      you can fight terrorism with other means that don’t include killing hundreds of civilians. whereas, there is really no way to fight war than with more war (unless you include economic warfare etc but that’s still kinda “war”; either way, your analogy is wrong)

    • Posted by Ryder Washington, at Reply

      But I thought u wanted to fight fire with fire? Pick a side and stick with it ffs.

  11. Posted by Darksider, at Reply

    Cenk hates America.

    • Posted by James Salvatore, at Reply

      There a difference between hating the US and the US Government. Btw, dumbass. America is a continent. Not a country. Seems you missed your geography class rofl.

    • Posted by ikzom, at Reply

      Trump supporters hate America by action, not just word.

    • Posted by Mint Julip, at Reply

      Huh? I always believed and was taught over 50 years ago that America is a country located in the North American Continent. I’m now not only old, but thick. Thank you.

  12. Posted by cuck, at Reply

    obama should know he did plenty of that

    • Posted by G Rodriguez, at Reply

      Oh yeh Republican hands are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo clean.

    • Posted by Martin Smith, at Reply

      Unfortunately that’s true.

    • Posted by 94KX, at Reply

      No, Bush beat Obama to it in his hunt for the WMDs years earlier. Nothing was found, though

  13. Posted by mmike10720, at Reply

    No I wouldn’t.
    Because giving terrorist more fuel for their fire doesn’t make sense in the slightest
    It’s easier to combat them when they don’t have any semblance of legitimacy.

    • Posted by mmike10720, at Reply

      Don’t try to answer a hypothetical by changing it?
      You literally changed the parameters of the original question to make a counter argument.
      YOU changed it.
      That aside
      the U.s. government already doesn’t send in forces in situations where there is no time to plan. So Me not acting is no different from the way military ops are already Carried out.
      That hypothetical situation u stated is impossible
      (you can’t save hostages If you don’t know where they are.)
      I.e there can’t be a scenario where you can save them by killing these terrorist because you don’t know where the hostages are. If you can find the hostages, you can’t find the terrorist HOLDING the hostages.

    • Posted by mmike10720, at Reply

      America has NEVER successfully in its history won a conflict in which the goal was the elimination of an ideology.
      Combating ideology with violence has NEVER worked in the history of man (every historical mass genocide that has taken place in the past 3,00p years or so has actually failed to eliminate the ideologies being targeted. And that is in the case of actual mass murder. How can a military strike work better?) and it will never work(wwII and the fight against the nazis was a ear that meant taking LAND from nazis and toppling the government and thus ending the conflict.. The goal was NOT destroying ideology of Nazism as a whole. And even if you argue that this was the goal, they failed. we still have neo-nazis)
      tl;dr: You can’t defeat ideology with violence It has NEVER happened in American history or in the past 3,000 years

    • Posted by erzan, at Reply

      WWII German Fascism and Japan Imperialism was defeated.

    • Posted by Martin Metivier, at Reply


      Their empires were defeated but not the ideologies. They were countries with armies not a faction hidden in the population. Defeating an army controlled by an ideology is possible and it was done often, but defeating an ideology whithin a population, with violence, has never worked.

      Find one idea that was crushed by violence and where people started to change their mind because of it.

      The truth is that the pro war lobby is influencing the population to try to get more influence and money.
      And they spread their nonsense on the easy to scare right wing media and their followers.

      The untold truth is that violence create terrorism, it does not scare it away, it promotes it and validates it in the eyes of the desperates who have nothing to lose anymore.

      And I am tired to read people saying that it’s the fault of the weakness of the left… when the US is a right/center-right country for the most part and is responsible for the rise of terrorism (at least in the eyes of the people who feel opressed) and where the wars in the middle east by so called strong leaders actually created the anti-american and anti-occident ideas that multiplied terrorists in all muslims countries.

      There will always be terrorits, the problem is that now that the occident helped their hateful message bombing their countries or their allies, they now get 10 times if not more more recruits than what they are supposed to have.

      Btw, terrorists in the history of the world, where not always on the wrong side.

      British administration in the US before the independance called Americans native insurgents, terrorists. Same with the resistance in France or east Europe during WWII. Same how Staline treated his adversaries that wanted to prevent him to kill millions of his own people. The scotish revolt against the British empire, the revolf of Haiti against the French… so many more.. all were terrorists in the eyes of the ocupation force.

      You might not think the US deserves this tag, but so did the empires opressing other people. And it’s not up to people living in peaceful countries to decide how other people seeing themselves under siege should feel. Even if they are wrong, their anti-occident feeling is real, killing more will only multiply the problem again.

      This is not weakness, it’s understanding how the problem is fueled and stay alive.

  14. Posted by IdarkphoenixI, at Reply

    Literally every war has collateral damage. What would have happened in WW2 if the allies said “oooh, we probably shouldn’t bomb those Nazis because we might accidentally hit someone else”

    • Posted by Tom Davies, at Reply

      +Charlie Cain

      Again, I don’t deny the west has played a significant role in the state of the Middle East. My point is that when people try to solely blame the west and claim the Muslim world is totally blameless and innocent in the whole debacle, they are trying to simplify the situation to suit what they want to believe.

      A quick point – people are very quick to blame western society for colonialism, forgetting that Muslims had been playing the same game, just as brutally with their own genocides and slave trade, for centuries (e.g. Ottoman, Persian etc). The fact is, horrible as it was, if you go back a short way in history everyone was at it. It was survival of the fittest, conquer or be conquered. It just so happened that in the period leading up to the world wars, the west had come out on top.

      Please take a look at the state of countries under Islamic law, complete with routine abuse of women, capital punishment for blasphemy, homosexuality, apostasy, forcing women to cover in public etc. I am an atheist, and I would be hung for my views in Afghanistan, Iran, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Please don’t try to blame this on the West.

      I’m not a right winger either, I’m a progressive. My opinion is that you can’t be liberal and support the stricter forms of Islam, and we are letting down moderate Muslims, Muslim women, and what must be millions of closeted gay Muslims by going far too soft on it.

    • Posted by Che X, at Reply

      +Johnny the Boy Who care what term im using. At least i gave evidence to back up my claims. Where is your evidence? Historians and political scientists will agree with me not you.

      Political science is my field. What makes you think you are on my level when its comes to geo-politics?

    • Posted by Che X, at Reply

      +Tom Davies people are very quick to blame western society for colonialism??

      Do know about the 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement or the 1917 Balfour Declaration?

      The 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement and the 1917 Balfour Declaration destroyed the entire Middle East Levant. The Palestinians also lost their lands to European Jewish refugees.

      So how can say Muslims had been playing the same game when muslims dont have a history like imposing their own version of the 1916 Sykes-Picot agreement or the 1917 Balfour Declaration.

    • Posted by Tom Davies, at Reply

      +Che X

      And what were the peaceful Muslim Ottoman victims up to at the time? Oh that’s right, they were busy murdering 1.5 million Armenians in a genocide.

  15. Posted by Master Joe Kerr, at Reply

    There’s a reason Cenk isn’t a general in the army.

    • Posted by G Rodriguez, at Reply

      A Republican who bankrupted America with an Iraq invasion & wiped 38 million jobs from the globe back in 08, while Wall St buddies lined their pockets somehow was reasoned into being leader of the “free world” – the most powerful job on the planet.

    • Posted by C Wilson, at Reply

      He could stay in shape like I do; by giving pelvic thrusts to your mom on a regular basis. Clothing optional.

  16. Posted by turkssom hall, at Reply

    Most Trump supporters are terrorists and should be killed.

    • Posted by pittygold99, at Reply

      turkssom hall
      That’s is so true!

    • Posted by Extreme Donald Trump, at Reply

      Please try libtard, we’re tired of playing nice.

    • Posted by 94KX, at Reply

      Thanks for saying “most” and not “all”, otherwise you’d be an ignorant uneducated oaf

  17. Posted by Jon Bones Jones, at Reply

    The “Young Turks” committed the Armenian genocide

    • Posted by Che X, at Reply

      Europeans committed the native american and australian genocide

    • Posted by Vanessthebest, at Reply

      Rod Stewart did a song about these kinds of people. Perhaps to leave that guy a nasty twitter ( TYT)

  18. Posted by atombond, at Reply

    Nice click bait TYT you fkn disgusting pigs.

    • Posted by Melanoma Trump, at Reply

      Young Turk (n), 1. Young progressive or insurgent member of an institution, movement, or political party. 2. A young person who rebels against authority or societal expectations.(American Heritage Dictionary)

    • Posted by Mirato DarkWolf, at Reply

      LOOOL a name means nothing. Their actions do, being a water boy for the DNC.

    • Posted by SilverWing27, at Reply

      atombomb Then I guess they got you if you’re here. lol

  19. Posted by Robert Leland, at Reply

    Obama killed more civilians in his 8 years than terrorists. Fact.